What the fuck is this question? I got it right because I identified why C is wrong. But E is still totally ridiculous. I would've thought this was a question from the 1980s.

@SimonArmendariz I didnt say anything about being one of the best of all time. You misunderstand what I wrote. I said it's safe to assume someone knows how to dribble a basketball if they've won 5 mvps.

@KevinLin nah, I was just frustrated I missed a layup question. All good now

"uh he he I don't know"

got the question right but did not follow your explanation at all in this video tbh

some of these explanations are not helpful. I'm finding this especially to be true of RC questions. Most of the explanations can be boiled down to, "this answer is correct because it is correct."

Bro how many times are u gonna punch this argument in the face?

u can't assume someone knows how to dribble a basketball if they've won 5 MVPs?

did not appreciate being forced into role-play while studying for the LSAT. If we're going there, at least call me your Lawyer in Charge ;)

my guy, this was not your best work.

@StevenNoPH Agreed. Too much information is also repeated, causing the videos to be much longer than they need to be.

So much information is repeated throughout these lessons. I would appreciate if the presenter took the time to condense his ideas. This easily could be a 12 minute video.

u cooked on this one

bro that "trick" was so lame. This should've been a 4 minute video.