if opbjectivity is an "ideal" wouldn't that imply that few historians could achieve it? Or would rejecting answer A be an example of being aggressive in selecting answer choices?
JY or Kevin if you don’t mind i’d love to know when I should be aggressive as JY was in question 1, opposed to leaving 2 answer choices like this. I felt like the other answer choice in the first question for passage A was something that could definitely be left as a potential answer.
how can passage A indicate that objectivity is essential for historians when the passage itself makes explicit reference to a type of historian (relativists) for whom objectivity is NOT essential? The passage doesn't really discuss all historians, it discusses Objective Historians
What is the most efficient way of tracking which answers you've eliminated while taking the LSAT?
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
8 comments
if opbjectivity is an "ideal" wouldn't that imply that few historians could achieve it? Or would rejecting answer A be an example of being aggressive in selecting answer choices?
JY or Kevin if you don’t mind i’d love to know when I should be aggressive as JY was in question 1, opposed to leaving 2 answer choices like this. I felt like the other answer choice in the first question for passage A was something that could definitely be left as a potential answer.
how can passage A indicate that objectivity is essential for historians when the passage itself makes explicit reference to a type of historian (relativists) for whom objectivity is NOT essential? The passage doesn't really discuss all historians, it discusses Objective Historians
What is the most efficient way of tracking which answers you've eliminated while taking the LSAT?