I am wondering if anyone would have any advice for choosing the right answer for these questions. This used to be a question type that went well for me but lately it seems like I keep getting them wrong. Has anyone else experienced this, and if so, how did go about answering these question types correctly again? Any general strategies for this question type would be really helpful. Thank you!
Any advice for breaking down SA questions into valid argument forms like JY does in the videos? The more questions I see, the more challenging it is to find an AC that matches my diagram. Is there another way to approach SA questions? Sometimes it seems like the AC for these questions is just a restatement of the conclusion and/or my prephrases don't match the answer choices very well. Does anyone think of these questions like strengthen questions? Any suggestions would be great! Thank you!
Looking for accountability study buddies online in preparing for the June test
If anyone would have any suggestions for my explanation for key take aways from this question, that would be great! Thanks!:
I definitely fell for the trap answer in figuring out this question. Answer choice A was tricky because it talks about lactose which is what is first addressed in the stimulus. However, lactose only "helps" in the absorption. It is not necessary or required. It is the calcium which is necessary, bringing in our knowledge of conditional logic. C is correct because it strengthens our conditional statement: "if bone repair, then absorption of calcium."
Does anyone have any good strategies for approaching flaw questions with more descriptive answer choices?
For those getting -0 in LG, would you have any advice for strategies during timed conditions? How did you finally make it to -0 in the whole section? Do you get -0 during timed conditions as well? If so, what do you think it was that finally got you there? When studying, I do a lot of drilling and fool proofing, but I still feel like there are so many points left on the table. Thank you!
How do you join this? And, what if you don't have access to PT 27? Do I have to buy it to participate? Thanks!
What strategies work best for you? How many passages do you attempt in practice tests? What have you found helps in increasing your score?
Thank you so much in advance!
Thanks @! Congrats on this, I hope I get there too!
@ and @ Thank you so much for your replies. I am looking for ideas for after Blind Review and having structure to study sessions. What have you done to give you the most increase in your score?
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone would have any ideas/suggestions for study plans in preparing for the September exam. I have gone through the CC and have been taking PT's but am looking for new ideas.
Thanks!
I don't think we are able to put this into a flaw category, right?
Is there another angle or approach I could take to solving more difficult flaw questions like this?
Thanks!
@ where did you purchase the Cambridge volume? Thanks!
Hi,
I was wondering if someone could help clarify something for me. When you see this particular question stem, "reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it presumes," do you think of trying to find an assumption or just to identify the flaw. Any suggestions for eliminating answer choices for these flaw questions that are more subtle?
Thank you!
Thank you so much for this @! Do you feel like conditional language shows up a lot in NA questions on newer tests? What is your strategy for quickly negating conditional answers under timed conditions?
Can someone explain how they approached this question and got to answer choice D? Thank you so much in advance!
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-01/
Any study groups in the Chicago area or anyone interested in starting a study group? Send me a message if interested. Thanks!
Hi,
Are you still looking for study buddies? Which test are you prepping for?
Does anyone know where I can purchase the Cambridge drill packets? Any other places to find questions to practice with?
Would anyone have any advice for selecting the correct answer choices for weaken questions? It seems that I still get stuck between two or three answers, especially the non-causation ones. How have you mastered this question type? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!
I want to join! What a great idea!
me too!