LR Tutoring with Sage Josh

https://media.giphy.com/media/qKltgF7Aw515K/giphy.gif

So what will be going down in these meetings and what do you need to do to prepare?

These classes are a live, Sage guided forum to help address whatever it is you're studying within LR. We'll use older tests to work through questions, discuss question types, break down argument structures, and analyze answer choices. We'll also talk general LR strategy and pacing. To prepare, just use whatever portion of the week's homework that is relevant to your current studies.

This week's homework: PT 35 Logical Reasoning

LR Tutoring with Sage Josh - PT 35

Monday, August 21, 7:30 PM EDT

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/853312053

You can also dial in using your phone.

United States: +1 (872) 240-3212

Access Code: 853-312-053

First GoToMeeting? Try a test session: http://help.citrix.com/getready

31

137 comments

  • Wednesday, Aug 23 2017

    @jhaldy10325 said:

    PT 35 is as far as I'm taking it, but will restart. Taking the next few weeks off as I prepare for the Sept Test and will restart probably first week of October.

    That's exactly what I was hoping for :) Awesome-ness

    I would say good luck with your Sept take, but I can honestly say I don't think I've ever known anyone as ready to humiliate this test as you are right now!

    2
  • Tuesday, Aug 22 2017

    PT 35 is as far as I'm taking it, but will restart. Taking the next few weeks off as I prepare for the Sept Test and will restart probably first week of October.

    0
  • Tuesday, Aug 22 2017

    Hey @jhaldy10325 are these sessions going to continue past PT35 or will they restart eventually at PT1?

    0
  • Monday, Aug 21 2017

    @achen013108 said:

    Is the next meeting today?

    yes :)

    0
  • Monday, Aug 21 2017

    Is the next meeting today?

    0
  • Monday, Aug 14 2017

    @twssmith644 said:

    To be clear, it is the logical reason section of prep test 34 tomorrow at 730 eastern?

    Today @ 7:30 EST.

    1
  • Wednesday, Aug 09 2017

    Hey, had a follow up question in PM that I thought was a really great question, so wanted to post my reply here as well for anyone who may be interested.

    From PT 33.1.22. https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-33-section-1-question-22/

    Answer choice B is attempting to exploit what I more broadly call the problem of knowledge (Knowledge is just a common incarnation of a much larger set of words that logically abstract the subject.) Here, it's "want" rather than "know" but the principle is always the same and frequently interchangeable.

    So an argument that would express the flaw B is talking about would look something like this:

    Congleton hired really terrible artists.

    The hiring of really terrible artists would ensure the project would fail.

    Therefore Congleton wanted the project to fail.

    Do you see how "want" is problematic here? What if Congleton is just really incompetent? We know in this argument that Congleton took action which will result in the failure of the project, but how can we draw a conclusion about their motives? We see this a lot and we can use this example to plug in a lot of different applications: knowledge, belief, expectation, etc:

    Therefore Congleton knew the project would fail

    Therefore Congleton believed the project would fail

    Therefore Congleton expected the project to fail.

    Answer choice B (assumes Fail ---> Congleton wanted it to fail) bridges the gap between the consequences of the actual argument and what Congleton wanted, thus accounting for the abstraction.

    So any time you see one of these words pop up, be aware of the nature of the abstraction. I can almost promise you the writers will be exploiting it.

    1
  • Monday, Aug 07 2017

    Having some issues launching gotomeeting, but on the way!

    0
  • Monday, Aug 07 2017

    Well, something came up and I have an important errand to run tonight. Caved and did 33 by myself with great results, will be glad to join next week though!

    1
  • Monday, Aug 07 2017

    That's correct @nishanik15535 . We may not get to everything, but will try to hit the highlights from both.

    0
  • Monday, Aug 07 2017

    I assume it would be both sections of LR from the PT since there was no specific section stated.. is that correct?

    0
  • Sunday, Aug 06 2017

    @jhaldy10325 said:

    We'll be glad to have y'all. @alexmedley502 , if you're a little late, it's no problem. Join when you can!

    Thanks! I'm actually excited to talk to you, I have read so many of your posts over the past nine months haha

    0
  • Sunday, Aug 06 2017

    We'll be glad to have y'all. @alexmedley502 , if you're a little late, it's no problem. Join when you can!

    1
  • Sunday, Aug 06 2017

    I'm going to join in as well if I make it home on time

    0
  • Friday, Aug 04 2017

    Thank you! Looking forward to this.

    1
  • Monday, Jul 31 2017

    Hi @saralouiseemerson288,

    Nice, in order to join please click the GoToMeeting link on the first page of this thread at the time of the meeting (7:30 p.m. EST). You might want to try clicking it now so that you can download any necessary internet browser plugins to make sure you are ready for 7:30.

    Have a great session!

    0
  • Monday, Jul 31 2017

    Hi There! Really interested in joining in today, how do I participate? I have the PT section done.

    0
  • Monday, Jul 24 2017

    @jhaldy10325 Thank you!

    0
  • Sunday, Jul 23 2017

    Hey guys, I just updated the title and body of the post to hopefully make it more immediately clear to everyone exactly what this is and what they need to do beforehand. For all the regulars out there, it will be the same format as before, so just keep doing what you've been doing. See you guys tomorrow!

    2
  • Wednesday, Jul 19 2017

    @826042 said:

    Sorry! just trying to understand. Do we complete an old full practice test timed, lets say PT31, and then we go over the answers together, like a blind review?

    The PT they will be going over is listed on the first post. In this case, PT31.

    1
  • Wednesday, Jul 19 2017

    Sorry! just trying to understand. Do we complete an old full practice test timed, lets say PT31, and then we go over the answers together, like a blind review?

    0
  • Monday, Jul 17 2017

    @vanessadfisher628 said:

    @tristandesinor505

    Thanks!

    Do you do the full PT ahead of time?

    You can do it as a full timed PT, but you can also use this PT as a drill and ask questions only about the questions you did.

    1
  • Monday, Jul 17 2017

    @tristandesinor505

    Thanks!

    Do you do the full PT ahead of time?

    0
  • Monday, Jul 17 2017

    @vanessadfisher628 said:

    @jhaldy10325

    Sorry if this is a dumb question. I'm new to trying these study groups.

    Can anyone just join in or is there a registration?

    No, you don't need to register. You can join the meeting from your computer by clicking the GoToMeeting link or dial in using your phone at 7:30pm EDT on Monday.

    Oldies But Goodies - PT 30

    Monday, July 17, 7:30 PM EDT

    Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/853312053

    You can also dial in using your phone.

    United States: +1 (872) 240-3212

    Access Code: 853-312-053

    First GoToMeeting? Try a test session: http://help.citrix.com/getready

    Maybe you should download the GoToMeeting app beforehand :smiley:

    @vanessadfisher628 said:

    Also, do we submit questions ahead of time?

    No, I think you can just ask during the meeting!

    0
  • Monday, Jul 17 2017

    @jkatz1488955

    @jhaldy10325 @danielmoshesieradzki129

    Hey, what's the focus for Monday's session? Will we be reviewing LR from PT 30? If so, which section will you be focusing on? Are there specific questions we should review for the 17th?

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?