Me too I got 3 right

Thank God it is not just me

Question 14 was fucking crazy

Thanks for your explanation, Kevin. I really understand this question now.

How the hell did you get most solved from the conclusion? Sorcery. Did you just take the contrapositive of "few"?

Initially, I left off where J. Y. did (i.e., leaving B, D, and E alive) but I took a minute to consider the wording of D and E (i.e., "MORE" skeptical) which essentially implied that Author A was skeptical and critical, which is inaccurate, so I got B :D

Ditto!

I am liking the split approach

What a shit show of a passage

I love you for that.

9/12 finally some progress

Can someone explain question 26 to me? He spoke a mile a minute and it is not clicking.

I love the way Kevin explains things. So much better than J.Y. !

Ughhhhh I had it right and then I picked A after getting latched onto the frivolous information.

This was HARD. I got A.

Everyone is calling Theodora bizarre, but I liked her argument LOL

Thank you for this!

Slay queen

It took me an hour to review the G3 indicators, try to understand what this guy is saying, only to realize that I should have waited for the cats and dogs analogy, which simplified everything for me. SMH.

His explanations make it more confusing. Can someone explain how to tackle formal argument questions and not sound like a robot.

I've been bombing the last couple of these questions and I think it's because I am not organizing my information accurately. Do you have any tips for sharpening my conditional logic skills OTHER THAN the lessons on conditional logic, since they were pretty unorganized and confusing in my opinion.

Sameeee I got this right but a 1/5 difficulty wrong

OK I think this finally clicked after 25 mins, or more, of studying this problem.

The first part: The reason why people with a high intake of foods rich in beta-carotene were much less likely to die from cancer in the first place is because NOT AS MANY OF THEM PARTICIPATED IN THE STUDY, as E states.

The second part: Now, the reason why this compound had no effect on the participants in the 12 year study is because this compound is useless because NOT SMOKING, our reasonable assumption, IS THE KEY to not dying from cancer.

It came down to answer choices D and E for me. I picked D because I did not understand E at all. Now I see that D does absolutely nothing for the argument and it reinforces the idea that the supplements are useless.

Hope this helps. Happy studying! :)

WHOOP I got it right

I hated all of these answers.