21 comments

  • Tuesday, Jun 24

    Me not understanding that decreased by 15% and increase by 15% are different things...... no wonder I couldn't make sense of this question

    3
  • Thursday, Apr 03

    Im confused, why are we talking about accidents when the passage does not tell us anything about that? Can someone explain the stimulus?

    2
  • Saturday, Jan 25

    is there a mistake in one of the explanations? for (A), last sentence says: But does (A) tell us why the new rush-hour speed is faster than the old one? No, it doesn’t explain the phenomenon at all.

    Should it say "why the new rush-hour speed is slower than the old one"?

    idk maybe my brain is a little squashed and i'm not processing the words right, but re-read the stim a few times to be sure

    0
  • Friday, Oct 25 2024

    I hated all of these answers.

    4
  • Saturday, Sep 14 2024

    #feedback --- For some reason there is no option to watch this video on high speed, as is usually available. Perhaps it's just me.

    2
  • Thursday, Aug 01 2024

    This question has me twisted on how we assume that accidents are the cause of high-speed limits. other ACs did not make sense either.

    1
  • Saturday, Jul 27 2024

    If youve ever driven in rush hour, youd know the difference" --

    me: They take a different route?

    Him: Driving slower means less accidents (:

    Me: assumption

    6
  • Wednesday, Jul 24 2024

    E is a crime.

    4
  • Saturday, Apr 06 2024

    Does anyone know where I can learn more about casual chains? I did not see a link in the "lessons to review" part. #feedback

    0
  • Wednesday, Dec 06 2023

    I might be overthinking this. I like c but when you're saying less mph→ less → less. aren't you shifting the arrow ←?

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?