Subscription pricing
Hey,
Planning on taking the October flex. I am PTing around 146-150 with goals of hitting around a 160 by October. If anybody would like to be my study buddy or even be a part of a study group. Please let me know!
PT Questions
amaar951639
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
amaar951639
Tuesday, Aug 11 2020
Interested! I am in EDT too.
amaar951639
Sunday, Aug 09 2020
@rowleyml603 Thank you for the support!
amaar951639
Sunday, Aug 09 2020
@nvg187791 It was very helpful. Thank you!
amaar951639
Sunday, Aug 09 2020
@nvg187791 Hey, I am getting around 145-150 on PTs and my goal score is a 160. Any advice? I feel like I am stuck and would appreciate some advice from someone who has increased their score by that much. Thank you.
amaar951639
Wednesday, Jul 22 2020
@fyepes582 Thank you for the reply. How did you make the inference ~B (--s--) D? I am having trouble making that inference.
Can someone please help me diagram and understand the inferences made from these statements?
Some As are Bs.
All Cs are Ds
No Bs are Cs.
Here is what I have so far.
AsomeB—-> ~C
~D—->~C
Inference: Asome~C
amaar951639
Saturday, Jun 13 2020
Thank you. This further explanation helped
amaar951639
Thursday, Jun 04 2020
I got rid of answer choice C for the same reasons. 'Automobile accidents' require a further assumption that it is a part of traffic fatalities. However, traffic fatalities can include much more than automobile accidents since the stimulus does not specify on what exactly 'traffic fatalities' includes and excludes. We cannot assume that the traffic fatalities consist of those only in cars. What about those on motorbikes? What about someone who was standing by the highway? For such reasons, I did not see a relation between driving speed and automobile accidents in the stimulus.
Please let me know if this works or if I have made a mistake in my reasoning somewhere! #help
amaar951639
Wednesday, Jun 03 2020
Could someone help in explaining the lawgic for the conclusion and why the "not" is outside of the brackets? I watched the previous lawgic videos that J.Y mentions but was not able to understand why it was negated in such a way. Why is it not /HP ----> HTE? Thank you. #help #help #help #help
amaar951639
Tuesday, May 26 2020
@theodolfmagat611 Thank you so much for the help. I have done a PT on chrome and had no problems. If it happens again, I will make sure to take a screenshot. Thank you again for the help.
amaar951639
Monday, May 18 2020
@theodolfmagat611 Thank you for the help. It happened during PT 42 (Fourth section). I was using safari browser before and now will try using Google Chrome to avoid a potential repeat of the issue.
During my last PT, there was some kind of glitch in my LR section. I was not able to see all of the answer choices and was shown only 3 answer choices for some questions or just 1 answer choice. I tried scrolling up (sometimes the answer choices are long) to see more but that didn't work either. I had to stop my PT and do a timed BR and then actually do BR. I'm not too sure if this has happened to anyone but if so, how did you solve this problem?
Thank you.
amaar951639
Thursday, May 14 2020
What would the Lawgic be for a/c (E)? #help
amaar951639
Tuesday, Feb 25 2020
I thought this question stem was asking for a main conclusion. Still got it right even though I knew B was not a direct translation of the MC. I am having trouble identifying the question stem as a RRE. How do you know this is a RRE? #help #help #help
amaar951639
Tuesday, Jan 21 2020
Very tricky question stem. I was treating this as a MBT and now realize, that it was a NA all along. Completely changes everything. Any help in understanding how this is a NA and not a MBT? #help
amaar951639
Thursday, Dec 26 2019
Having a hard time understanding this flaw. Unsure of why A is wrong and D is right. #help #help #help
amaar951639
Thursday, Dec 19 2019
@lexxx74569 Thank you so much.
also interested if still taking people!