#feedback please read the incorrect answer choices all the way through instead of skimming and quickly eliminating in explanation videos. when I pick wrong answers I wanna fully understand where and why they're wrong.

ok I think I understand better now, thank you!

I don’t understand this explanation..the ac says the animals left due to industrial development it doesn’t say the natives were prevented from using the herd animals because of industrial development? I interpreted like they weren’t used because they simply werent available in the area anymore because the habitat was destroyed by buildings etc? Surely they could have gone else where to get the animals they needed? I don’t see how we can jump to them being “prevented” just because they weren’t available in the area anymore? i don’t see how this is analogous to the situation in the passage in which an actual law was preventing the use of the otters…can you explain further how this is an example of “traditional” based on the passage? #help

#help what determines a drill easy, medium or hard? I selected easy and got one passage with question difficulties 3/5-5/5 and the PSG/Game/S Difficulty were all 5/5 and the second passage had all 1/5-2/5 question difficulties and the PSG/Game/S Difficulty were all 1/5? I usually drill easy first then move on to medium then hard to make sure I'm grasping all the techniques, but I wanted to understand how the drills are ranked if the easy ones still have difficult pasages+questions? #feedback

For the first time, I got every single question correct on this lesson, small wins :)

Reading both answers completely I understand why A is wrong, but from the POE demonstrations in previous videos and this one, I thought it could eliminated without too much thought (trying to learn to do these questions quickly as well as correctly) b/c I was looking for the author’s conclusion and the “Anthropologists” in both answer choices led me to eliminate them both without reading through them carefully. I guess to my understanding, that’s what we were supposed to do based on the explanation for A. but I see now that the question is also asking for a “summary” so that makes C the strongest choice. I think I got too hyper-focused on looking for the Authors words.

Okay so after watching the explanation, I'm confused. You eliminated A immediately after reading that it starts "Some anthropologists argue that" and that's literally the reason I eliminated C initially. Reading "Anthropologists are divided in their assessments" is basically the same as "Some anthropologists argue that" to me. Maybe it is not a good strategy to teach to eliminate before reading the answer choices completely. Doing that is the reason I got this wrong. Is my thinking wrong? #feedback #help

Yes, it does thank you! I also used another program to get better at conditional mapping since it wasn't clicking but I now see the indicators! (duh lol)

some of these questions click and then some don't at all

These are taking me foreverrrrrrrr. I'm getting them right tho

Some places do issue their own citations. It is weird but at my school they have their own system separate from the police that gives out tickets. If you don't pay its billed to your student account

I got this right, but it took 6 mins. I have trouble mapping out the stimulus in my head and then trying to remember/compare it to the long-winded answer choices. I used the the highlighting feature to help develop a color pattern hoping to make it easier to remember but it still takes too long I fear.

Wowwww

Weaken questions were my weakness buttt I got this correct :))

yes, I love this! its also reassuring because I knew it was an RRE question immediately. More of this please! #feedback

Ummmm we are not ALL 22-24 JY

So I got this correct, But I wasn't sure how to map the Application out correctly? There are no indicators so I couldn't tell if it was confusing sufficient/necessary. I just assumed it was because of the lesson. Would a deeper explanation of this please

agreed

grammar is a bitch.

This explanation is confusing but if you slow it down it makes a lot of sense

Going to try to explain hopefully I can help. I was also stuck b/t A and D. I think it is more important to focus on how the discovery of substances relates to the development of these medicines which is what the conclusion is about. D is saying (the study of these plants --> discovery of substance with medicinal value) but what if there is another way to get the substance with medicinal value that could then get us to the medicines we need? this is just one way to get the medicines we need but it is not the only way so the study of these plants is not necessary, therefore, D is backwards. We need the discovery of the substances to be dependent on the study of the plants. Or the only way to get the substance is by studying the plants. I hope that makes sense?

I just want to be more confident in my answer choices especially when they are correct. Does confidence come with understanding or intuition?

4/5 on medium, hardest question was the only one I missed. I am satisfied with that lol cause I literally was getting them all wrong in the lessons. I was going to stop and move on to a different section but I decided to push through. Once I realized that I am looking for the missing sufficient assumption in the answer choice I think that helped me understand a little better also I stopped diagraming I think that was confusing me more not sure but whateverrr

Ngl probably gonna have to skip these. I do not get it at all.

Finally got one right :)