I dont think B is attacking the premise.

1) We are told most people did not choose high salary as most desirable. that means some could have, which is consistent with B.

2) We know most didnt choose it has MOST desirable. So it was low-medium desirable. It could still have been chosen right.

A and C still dont strengthen bc our stim is a bout weather being a MAJOR cause, sure, according to A and C, those could be minor causes and considering them doesnt weaken the argument, theyre irrelevant at best. :D

the possibility of determining market is WHOLE DIFFERENT IDEA than the actual market it self. I feel like C would be right had it said the market for rugs is positive. in that case mario would say no and renate would say yes. this whole being able to determine is bs.

Even if you misread the q stem, E is the only one that even makes sense. A-D are wrong for very concrete reasons.

A: either can satisfy, great, why tf is the lower one being recommended?

B: but its the same so contrapose and SHOULDNT select less powerful hurts the argument.

C; best value? theyre both worth the same you have to assume that a thing that gets the job done is the best value which doesnt really make sense.

D: highest commission? theyre both worth the same.

As for E, if you hear the salesperson say E in your mind, it makes sense. Salesperson: blah blah, consumer should choose least powerful. isnt that an advice then?

the thing with this question is, youre not just reading respondents argument and finding a flaw. if you do that youre not answering the question, which is the respondents REPLY TO THE DEBATERS ARGUMENT, which is about hierarchy. then it becomes crystal clear that D is the only flaw that we need to worry about. R is REPLYING to another argument. well in that case, the flaw you pick better have something to do with something the debater addresses.

rare in that the premise has a should in it.

your common, two extremes type argument.

sooooooo I picked B but on BR, i see an issue.

Edgar says: in order to blah blah, shut down, which is PSF -> shut down

but B says the only reason for shut down is survival of fish. which is:

shut down-> PSF

wtf. am i missing something??!??!?!?!

a NA would probz be that the spending will NOT stay the same, which is essentially what A is saying.

Even with B, I'm not sure if it was written the way JY says, it still wouldn't be correct. What does a year of being built have to do with modern facilities? what if an old ass building can still have REALLY modern facilities? You'd be making yet another assumption in thinking that old building=old facilities/tech. Why cant a building from the 80s also have top notch BP measuring instruments etc?

A is bullshit af. Yes, I totally see that the author mistook luck and hard work to be a not both relationship right away, how tf is this N/S confusion......

does better mean more accurate?!??!

A is pretending to be no cause and still effect, which is a also a classic weakener.

c says magazines under discussion. plural. doesnt that mean its referring to our magazine AND BWR??!?! aka pointing out a similarity, thus not helping us weaken an analogy?

conc: money doesnt exist.

why? a uni loss in belief in money is sufficient to make money disappear.

aka if something did actually exist->> then you could have loss in belief yet the money would exist?

a) precisely that.

b) if it exists--->then you have mistaken beliefs...mmm where does mistaken beliefs come form??

c) in order to exists---> the thing must have practical consequences but who is to say that loss in belief means there are no practical consequences???

d) were trying to conclude NOT exist.

e) nah. no need to equate a property of money to the market in general.

A on the other hand, is close. would it be right if it said no preference of NS plants OVER OTHER PLANTS then maybe it works. but we dont care about KINDS OF NS PLANTS!!

NTS; exceed doesnt mean shit. it could exceed by a dollar bruh.

And if I keep dec and let's just say I scored 10 points low lol how does acdom think about that????

That dope ass moment when you're Indian, Hindu and have a penchant for reading Tagore on your leisure time. Tagore's passage was such a breeze! YAS. This was my last take and I'm proud to say it was my best test yet! THANK YOU 7SAGE AND JY. SO MUCH LOVE FOR YOU ALL.

@ right back at you :) y'all, Josh is the man to go to during your insane times. Literally thank you 100x for being super fast in communicating and guiding me as a tutor and a friend :)

but our premise says no newspaper covers all sides of EVERY one of it stories...isnt that a super set of which important stories are a part of.......

i mean every is every... doesnt it itself, by definition include important and unimportant stories. so how do you know to distinguish them? the premise in the stim never said no newspaper covers all sides of A story. then i feel like its clear that important and just any one story dont have to overlap. HELP!

@ you can deff do it :) took me 1.5 years to do it but every second, now in retrospect was absolutely worth it. Just make sure you're not taking BR for granted!

@ you reached your goal you're good to go. I feel really proud of our achievements!!

@ you 100% can with 7sage. The biggest lesson for me was to get back up no matter how many times I fell: that includes shitty PT scores, freezing up during wacky ASS games, burn out etc. you can do it. :)

Thank you guys :) @ feels amazing doesn't it :)

I'm just really really relieved right now :) 1.5 years later, it's over :)))