@31451 you can deff do it :) took me 1.5 years to do it but every second, now in retrospect was absolutely worth it. Just make sure you're not taking BR for granted!
@twssmith644 you reached your goal you're good to go. I feel really proud of our achievements!!
@928 you 100% can with 7sage. The biggest lesson for me was to get back up no matter how many times I fell: that includes shitty PT scores, freezing up during wacky ASS games, burn out etc. you can do it. :)
Thank you guys :) @twssmith644 feels amazing doesn't it :)
I'm just really really relieved right now :) 1.5 years later, it's over :)))
Ya girl went from a 137 to a 160. Proud is all I feel right now. Thank god feb was my best take yet and highest score to date. LSAT IS OFFICIALLY OVER.
Thank you Nicole, Jimmy, David, Corey, and anyone else I've talked to. Most importantly, god bless JY.
That dope ass moment when you're Indian, Hindu and have a penchant for reading Tagore on your leisure time. Tagore's passage was such a breeze! YAS. This was my last take and I'm proud to say it was my best test yet! THANK YOU 7SAGE AND JY. SO MUCH LOVE FOR YOU ALL.
AND. E says covering the history of a single culture. We only know that they used to not mention history of Africa or Asia etc. Why assume that doing so means its only covering history of a single culture.
I dont think B is attacking the premise.
1) We are told most people did not choose high salary as most desirable. that means some could have, which is consistent with B.
2) We know most didnt choose it has MOST desirable. So it was low-medium desirable. It could still have been chosen right.
But arent you assuming that the two elements are causal to begin with? we just know theres some relation between upgraded textbooks and cosmo education. why are you assuming its causal? yes your mechanism is on point to strengthen but we just dont know if it CAUSED that.
A and C still dont strengthen bc our stim is a bout weather being a MAJOR cause, sure, according to A and C, those could be minor causes and considering them doesnt weaken the argument, theyre irrelevant at best. :D
the possibility of determining market is WHOLE DIFFERENT IDEA than the actual market it self. I feel like C would be right had it said the market for rugs is positive. in that case mario would say no and renate would say yes. this whole being able to determine is bs.
Even if you misread the q stem, E is the only one that even makes sense. A-D are wrong for very concrete reasons.
A: either can satisfy, great, why tf is the lower one being recommended?
B: but its the same so contrapose and SHOULDNT select less powerful hurts the argument.
C; best value? theyre both worth the same you have to assume that a thing that gets the job done is the best value which doesnt really make sense.
D: highest commission? theyre both worth the same.
As for E, if you hear the salesperson say E in your mind, it makes sense. Salesperson: blah blah, consumer should choose least powerful. isnt that an advice then?
the thing with this question is, youre not just reading respondents argument and finding a flaw. if you do that youre not answering the question, which is the respondents REPLY TO THE DEBATERS ARGUMENT, which is about hierarchy. then it becomes crystal clear that D is the only flaw that we need to worry about. R is REPLYING to another argument. well in that case, the flaw you pick better have something to do with something the debater addresses.
no bc they could have given the highest rating per the premise of the argument, but with A in mind, it could be the case that they gave their highest rating MAYBE BC they were in favor of the book anyway.
your common, two extremes type argument.
and exactly the reason you use to eliminate E, why cant that be used to eliminate B either?!?! arent they both saying shutting down → protection of fish?!?!
sooooooo I picked B but on BR, i see an issue.
Edgar says: in order to blah blah, shut down, which is PSF -> shut down
but B says the only reason for shut down is survival of fish. which is:
shut down-> PSF
wtf. am i missing something??!??!?!?!
a NA would probz be that the spending will NOT stay the same, which is essentially what A is saying.
Even with B, I'm not sure if it was written the way JY says, it still wouldn't be correct. What does a year of being built have to do with modern facilities? what if an old ass building can still have REALLY modern facilities? You'd be making yet another assumption in thinking that old building=old facilities/tech. Why cant a building from the 80s also have top notch BP measuring instruments etc?
A is bullshit af. Yes, I totally see that the author mistook luck and hard work to be a not both relationship right away, how tf is this N/S confusion......
even then, with D, so what if they are making more than MW? by how much? one cent? does that mean shit? the argument still stands bc we dont know by how much the RAISE will be!
A is pretending to be no cause and still effect, which is a also a classic weakener.
bc popular is not a part of the premise. its just an adjective for the film. the argument is not: conc: Q's criticism is misguided premise: bc its popular.
rather it is Q criticism is misguided, premise: bc it meets the task it was supposed to do, which was to be funny. popularity is irrelevant to drawing this conclusion.
@jhaldy10325 right back at you :) y'all, Josh is the man to go to during your insane times. Literally thank you 100x for being super fast in communicating and guiding me as a tutor and a friend :)