User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT146.S2.Q22
User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Wednesday, Apr 30

this one was brutal

User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Thursday, Apr 24

Is there a way to see the analytics of this question?

User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Thursday, Apr 24

So, I approached it a bit differently and I’m not sure if this is still valid. I wrote: If self-sustaining → 250+ → not current habitat.

I still arrived at the same conclusion, since negating "current habitat" is logically equivalent to "acquiring a larger habitat." "Acquiring a larger habitat" could mean expanding the existing one—making it different from its current state—or it could mean moving to a completely separate habitat that still meets the 250+ requirement. Does that interpretation also hold up or is this exam just making me lose my mind?

User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Friday, Mar 14

Wait im cooking...

User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Thursday, Mar 13

took me 6 minutes. but I got it. my god.

PrepTests ·
PT117.S3.Q17
User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Friday, Mar 07

You sound PISSED in this video LOL

User Avatar
andycabrera19882
Wednesday, Mar 05

"An impossible scenario" is huge here tbh. LSAT writers know very well that you're not supposed to use outside knowledge, so they added that in order to cover the basis and not expect you to make the assumption that the two are incompatible concepts.

User Avatar

Friday, Apr 04

andycabrera19882

Approach strategy

I’m gradually grasping several crucial concepts and developing my intuition. Even when I make mistakes, I identify my errors and comprehend the concepts well and in less time.

However, I’m having a large problem: I’m unsure whether it’s more advantageous to read the stimulus first or the question stem. I’ve seen varying opinions, with some suggesting that reading the stimulus first is better, while others promote the opposite approach. What do you guys do, and what are the benefits of doing that approach for you?

Confirm action

Are you sure?