I took my first full length Practice test today and got a 160. My goal is 167-168 by the August LSAT. I was wondering if anyone else could share how much they improved in a 2 month window. Is it doable to get those 7-8 points in 2 months. I’m just curious about other people and their scores. Thank you.
@thr107 There is an entire curriculum devoted to teaching you how to answer these types of questions. If the creators find value in identifying question stems, then I am sure this is worth our time. If you think I was talking down on you, you must agree that you were also talking down on 7sage. Good luck, I'm sure you're fun to be around!
@thr107 Honestly if you came this far in the Logical reasoning module and still don't know how this helps that is a red flag. By being able to quickly identify what type of question you are about to answer you can apply the methods we learned in core curriculum as well as just know what to look for, which in turn will save you so much time on the LSAT, time being one of the most important factors. Good luck.
If one thing, the second thing is likely. The second thing did not, so its likely the first was not.
The flaw I found: "/A-X, A-Y, Therefore Y-X" In the stimulus and answer choice B
Most A are B, Most B are C, Therefore most A are C = Flawed argument. Look for arguments with Most, Most, Most > Then apply flawed argument.
@WendellAdom There was no group in the study that did not take either. The reporter was referring to the study of two groups; one that took only M and the other that took only N
@madameatt13ke literally the same for me. Had it selected then chose B cuz idk what deleterious meant, got it on blind review tho
@MarieChavis My guess is many people got this wrong that would explain the difficulty.
The fact that I interpreted "not all" as "some do not" really helped me on this one.
I can't believe I actually got this right and knew why it was right. +51 seconds but still.
@RafaelGahan that’s a huge jump. Very impressive. Do you mind sharing how you improved? Was it through drilling, sections, multiple PTs, more emphasis on reviewing wrong answers?