- Joined
- Jan 2026
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
@thr107 There is an entire curriculum devoted to teaching you how to answer these types of questions. If the creators find value in identifying question stems, then I am sure this is worth our time. If you think I was talking down on you, you must agree that you were also talking down on 7sage. Good luck, I'm sure you're fun to be around!
@thr107 Honestly if you came this far in the Logical reasoning module and still don't know how this helps that is a red flag. By being able to quickly identify what type of question you are about to answer you can apply the methods we learned in core curriculum as well as just know what to look for, which in turn will save you so much time on the LSAT, time being one of the most important factors. Good luck.
If one thing, the second thing is likely. The second thing did not, so its likely the first was not.
The flaw I found: "/A-X, A-Y, Therefore Y-X" In the stimulus and answer choice B
Most A are B, Most B are C, Therefore most A are C = Flawed argument. Look for arguments with Most, Most, Most > Then apply flawed argument.
@WendellAdom There was no group in the study that did not take either. The reporter was referring to the study of two groups; one that took only M and the other that took only N
@madameatt13ke literally the same for me. Had it selected then chose B cuz idk what deleterious meant, got it on blind review tho
@MarieChavis My guess is many people got this wrong that would explain the difficulty.
The fact that I interpreted "not all" as "some do not" really helped me on this one.
I can't believe I actually got this right and knew why it was right. +51 seconds but still.
I got it right but that red circle on the blind review made me think I got it wrong so I changed my answer. I updated my blind review settings because that was rlly confusing me.
After I finished answering and went to the blind review, I was like surely this is gonna be one minute over the target time, and somehow i got 23 seconds below. W
Finally predicted an answer before reading the AC