Damn, you learned fast. That much improvement in only six months is incredible. Congrats on a job well done.

Two thumbs down on this dumb question.

Q20. These type questions are entirely subjective and should not be on the LSAT.

Q24. These type questions are entirely subjective and should not be on the LSAT.

B is a terrible answer that requires many assumptions.

Geez, that's hard to see. But when you see it (i.e., after I hear JY explain it,) then it clicks and it's so clear.

It just means you have to accept ASU's offer if they accept you. You are bound and cannot go anywhere else. Binding usually helps a little if you are below the means.

I'm gonna bookmark this problem and look for a similar LSAT question that would count A wrong because it's missing "well written." Gotta love the LAST "tricks" unethical and all.

WTF?! PT69 LR is the worst. UGH, so stupid.

Answer E is a big middle finger from LSAT writers to all us test takers.

Nope. Not interested.

I disagree with the explanation of D on Q13. The passage never infers the archivists were previously making decisions between what is dispensable and essential. The invent of technology as a means to save information is a new development which requires archivist to determine dispensable from essential information. Prior to this technology, the need to categorize information was not present, otherwise the task would have already been done (or continually been practiced as a process) and there would not he a push to hurry and do it before "running out of time." To assume, "300 years ago, of course they were determining dispensable from essential" is a big assumption that is not in the passage. However, if the new technology requires this determination, and it was not already performed, then D is logically correct and and should not be an incorrect answer.

Now this is an LSAT question that should have been removed from scoring.

Let's do this! My test is at noon eastern time tomorrow! Any thoughts on pre-test warm up?

Good one.

Damn. Hard one.

How is your 500+ people study group going? Ha

I would reschedule it if I were you. The first and only time I took the actual LSAT I was in a similar situation. I was scoring in the 160's but not consistently. I decided to go for it based on the advice, "you can cancel it if you bomb it, plus it's good experience." Well, I did bomb it, and I did cancel the score. However, it did NOT give me any worthwhile experience; it's identical to the law hub PT's with the addition of a proctor. Plus, l wasted my "cancelled" score, when I already knew the possibility of bombing it was high. Not to mention, the unneeded stress, waste of an entire day, and taking some of my confidence. My new plan, and advice to everyone else is, DO NOT take the LSAT until you are consistently scoring on your PT's what you want to score on the actual exam. Just my two cents. -B

Crappy question. I guess that's why 40% get it wrong.

I guess if you are not familiar with how the lottery games work you will be disadvantaged by this question. I don't think this should an LSAT question at all.

Five star explanation. Thanks, JC!

This SHOULD NOT be on the LSAT. Without economics knowledge you can't get this correct (unless you guess it correctly.)

Extremely difficult passage. I normally kill RC; but this RC killed me.

This is my favorite LSAT question so far. It seems really hard, but if you read it slowly and analyze it then answer choice A just crystalizes. So cool. The key for me was the parents "conclude" meaning they believe something that might not be true. And the other key is the president starts with "one possible explanation" but his conclusion treats the argument as the ONLY possible explanation. Boom, A.

Guess, move on. :)