Yeah, this is the type of question you skip

There's no mention of "emotional dimensions" in here or anything resembling it. I know D wasn't really a good AC either but I pulled my support from the passage:

The act of reading narrative literature is uniquely suited to the development of what might be called flexible ethical thinking.

But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically

Does this not suggest they are able to replicate the starting conditions and the results are altered radically via small changes to those starting conditions? Would appreciate some insight in case I am misinterpreting.

Spoken like a true politician

@nmhmd8 That does make sense. It looks like I just have to get better at interpreting such phrases under the pressure of time. Good luck if you're taking this upcoming exam!

Passage B including "(one might almost say obvious)" is the whole reason I didn't choose A. To me it signals the author's viewpoint that this is the right solution so they are endorsing the argument. If it didn't include this little dingleberry of an input I would have no qualms about this answer choice being the correct one. Of course the other answer choices aren't much better either but wtf I guess.

Gotta make sure to read very carefully, very obvious when the word theory was pointed out.

Finally got 100% on one of these :)

@CalebMichale He's keeping it real though

Gonna take a break, listen to some Slowdive.

These questions and passages are so much easier when they use words and language that are easily understandable, who would've thought.

Impressed myself by getting it right but it did take a little longer than it probably should have.

Pray for those poor crocodiles and babies being forced into a room with 5 lawyers.

If they made all the questions related to dinosaurs I'd get them all right

Was hunting for the answer choice that attacked the analogy directly. Helped me find the answer very quickly.

Found this one kinda dumb. So if they sell ONLY plants guaranteed to be disease-free then the guarantee can still be moot? What's the point of a guarantee then? I see why the other choices are less supported though.

Ended up eliminating all of the options then I had to reread the stimulus and I got it.