User Avatar
clannaman3
Joined
May 2026
Subscription
Coach

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
3.65
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Fordham
In process
GSU
In process
Howard
In process
Stanford
In process

Discussions

PrepTests ·
PT102.S3.Q17
User Avatar
clannaman3
5 days ago

What confused me, if it helps anyone, is I read “people have leisure when resources are plentiful” not realizing the “not when scarce” addition makes plentiful resources a necessary condition

“When resources are plentiful, people have leisure” is PR -> L

“People have leisure when resources are plentiful, not when scarce” means ppl have leisure only if PR

which would then be L -> PR

Still got it correct but perhaps would’ve been faster if my diagram made sense lol

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
6 days ago

@TeklaCo Thinking of it as a strengthen question would've helped a lot

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
6 days ago

one of my favorite things to do has become guessing the difficulty of a question by the number of comments in the discussion

2
User Avatar
clannaman3
Wednesday, Jun 17

Nice!!

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
Tuesday, Jun 16

@BoluwatiwiAlabi lmao I feel this every time I get on 7sage

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
Tuesday, Jun 16

These games are great played both!! Great for strengthening intuition with conditionals

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
Tuesday, Jun 16

@GavinSchuerch if this is your first pass through the curriculum trust that English may not feel so intuitive when you get to the LR curriculum cause I definitely just came back 😅

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
Tuesday, Jun 16

@Kevin_Lin Two words that come to mind are evince and dearth

3
User Avatar
clannaman3
Tuesday, Jun 9

@ratman23 It'll be like "98% of students get this right" okay then I'll just go cry ig

6
User Avatar
clannaman3
Tuesday, Jun 9

@Sunnieqw22 I don't think so. My reasoning for D was different (tutors correct me if I'm wrong), but regardless of the size, I feel like the text establishes that a major asteroid strike only kills organisms in or near the region. So whether the asteroid was not of equal size or there was no other asteroid, it still would not account for the dinosaurs presumably being located all over the world. E is the only choice that accounts for this

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
Sunday, May 31

Completely off topic but the way 7sage breaks down sentences in the stimulus would be so helpful for learning languages and knowing how each part of a sentence modifies the meaning

5
User Avatar
clannaman3
Sunday, May 31

I liked this video a lot, specifically her clear explanations and annotations of the questions + the notes

3
User Avatar
clannaman3
Sunday, May 24

@PeachATL this^^

4
User Avatar
clannaman3
Saturday, May 23

@DamianoVigneri I think of the "all" indicator as placing one circle inside the other. In order for everyone who is 21+ to be able to purchase alcohol, the 21+ circle must be inside the 'can purchase alcohol' circle. It doesn't work in reverse. If the 21+ is the superset, then only a subset of this population would be in the 'can purchase alcohol' bubble.

1
PrepTests ·
PT142.S1.Q23
User Avatar
clannaman3
Saturday, May 23

@rayanessafi It's my understanding that the Geologist's claim is "the scientists' challenge to the dominant view is refuted by the presence in petroleum of biomarkers."

geologist view: petroleum is formed from the fossilized remains of pants and animals (which would produce biomarkers)

scientist view: petroleum is formed from deep carbon deposits

The best way to weaken the geologist's argument is to find a source of biomarkers that is not fossils. Strains of bacteria deep in the Earth's crust is a plausible alternative explanation as to why biomarkers could be found in petroleum

1
User Avatar
clannaman3
Friday, May 22

@DestinyBoyles My understanding was that you have two rules, and Kumar arriving 17 minutes after the last ring falls outside the scope of those. I think of it like a language your computer can't process.

You know if that if someone was marked late, than they arrived 5+ minutes after the homeroom bell. You also know that if someone did not arrive 5+ minutes after the homeroom bell, than they were not marked late.

However, you were not given a rule for interpreting what happens when 5+ min late is the sufficient condition, so you have no information to make an inference. It's like your code throwing an error

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?