- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Applications
Discussions
I know I felt that way for some time, especially with the time. My issue was always the time and I always knew the concept and everytime I would drill I always got questions correct so I tried to be honest take a deep breath and answer one question at a time instead of rushing it! Another thing that rlly helped me was reviewing questions that I got wrong no matter what! If I do a section I like to review all questions 1-25 to ensure that I am not missing on any answer choices + I didn't second guess myself and that has rlly helped me! Tbh for RC I never used 7sage idk it was jus a personal preference! and I felt it also helped me balance my score in RC + LR :) + OFC my tutor as played a big role in my studies as well! and again also my hard work :) I am able to help if u need any advice or anything else!
For E - We have no idea about the requirement for the soft track so it is wrong :(
The way I approached this question is ok we are given the whole idea of cabinet undersecretary and how they are expected to serve as a cabinet secretary when the acual sec is unavailable...but we also know that for sure Foreign Citizens aren't allowed to serve as public servants... so if anything if the actual sec isn't available then for sure the undersecrtary DOES NOT HAVE TO BE A FOREIGN CITIZEN.
LOL, this is so funny because ok u are saying the sample is small (you recognize it) and then after sometime you're like ok fine banning PCB was effective? I feel like a lot of poeple might have been throw off w the idea of the results being intresting?
A: Does make sense because if your audience isn't able to understand it why would you put it in the first place? erum
BRUHH THAT WAS SO HARD BUT I GOT IT CORRECT - PROCESSS OF ELLIMINATIONNNN :)))
@irimabaribe525 Oh I see, I didn't catch that but now it makes sense that they were talking more generally about the general election compared to the survey which is what D attacks - because ok if viewers surveys prior to the debate said that they would vote for tanner then you cannot say that just because of the debate people voted for tanner. That does make sense now!
@taraodonnellm857 I didn't choose D becauseee I felt like those were their "trophies" u know? idk I felt like I didn't connect that I might have been dumb
@nlkhamis275 True, and it also comes down to assuming I guess, because the premise is written in such a way where you can assume that there could be nothing wrong w priv companies competing against each other if they all have the same rights, and then I thought about it and I was like hmmhmh no, I am just bringing my own thoughts in this :)



They could be many other different factors the argument says critical acclaim is "one of the main factor" the conclusion is making it seem like it is the only factor.