I don't know about others, but negative comparisons are tough for me so I like to think about it like this:

Artists are no less politically insightful than non-artists.

1. Acknowledge there could be a tie

2. Switch out "no less" with "more"

3. Then you know artists COULD be the winner

I don't know why I just have a hard time identifying who the winner could be and if they are on the "more" or "less" side. Not sure if this makes sense to other people but wanted to put it here to see if it might help someone. :)

E seemed too obvious that I was scared to pick it because I thought it was a bait and I'm tired of being a dumb, smelly fish.

When doing the "swing" on the comparative in Question 1, would you insert "more further advanced" into the original comparative, and then use "less further advanced?" I know the grammar isn't exactly right with both of those but if you do the "swing" for question 1 that would read "not further advanced" which would then mean that you've made it so they could be equal. I could be overthinking it or just can't think of the antonym for further lol.

Is there ever a time in comparatives when B could come before A?

I always have a different assumption than the one I was supposed to have haha. I thought the correct answer would be about the assumption that meteor strikes DO have worldwide effects (which I have because of all the dinosaur extinction documentaries I watched as a kid).

I feel like this is the first time during one of these practice questions that I could fully explain (in my head) why the correct answer was correct, and the wrong answers were wrong. Most of the time I've just been saying "oh that's irrelevant" to wrong answers when there's usually a more explanatory reason why wrong answers are wrong.

I was looking for an answer choice that gave us a different reason for why tornadoes were occurring more so this just fully broke my brain. :) And it hurt extra seeing the difficulty be so low. :) yippee

Can we get some Fs in the chat for Logic Games? Lmao

I feel like I got to the fact that B is incorrect because the stimulus doesn't tell us anything about the state of what the ocean was like before phosphorous doubled. Is that correct? It seemed like J.Y.'s explanation contradicted my reasoning.

I feel like so many of the lessons were "disagree" questions that I forgot "agree" questions existed, so I'm glad I got one of the "agree" questions haha.

I got it under time!!........ but i was wrong :) CLASSIC

Is there ever a time where the stim doesn't have any comparative claims, but the correct answer choice does contain a comparative claim? Or is it always the case that if the stim doesn't include a comparative, we can always eliminate comparative answer choices?

I'm fricked.

Got a real gripe with question #5!!!! It's not fair to assume that WE should make a contextualized inference that politicians and society's elite are the same when there IS NO CONTEXT in the question. If on the LSAT there was a sentence prior that read something along the lines of "citizens of a nation presuppose that politicians and society's elite are the same.," then I'm happy to make that inference.

I'm so dumb, all i could think of when I saw property was that an organization owned land that it's employees didn't have...

Anyone else get a question about domesticated wolves and dog breeds? Got me heated that's for sure

I have somehow gotten much worse at these questions over time... Is my brain frying?