Also, live in Toronto. Please let me know how y'all are going to coordinate this!

Me just realizing the LSAT just gives you super complicated question stems just to blatantly show a flaw in the argument.

why is B better? I guess the first pargraph mentions how new evidence is brought to light taht the platypus uses it's bill to locate prey at a distance. wow. lol.

I was choosing between A and E. A had me stumped for a second because I thought if the workers have to pay for it themselves at a nuclear plant makees it a worse place to work than an industrial plant. But that is an unfair assumption to make. E is the better choice.

A right. Suggests that they added an additional layer of cobalt after the painting was already done before 1804. This is why cobalt appears in both studies, but it is suggested that the painting was created before cobalt was ever used.

what would be a good name for this type of mistake?

i literally had no idea what the stimulus was trying to say

I am as well

Hi! Great idea. Discord link didn't work for me.

would A be wrong if we needed a necessary assumption? But since it's only a sufficient assumption, we can assume that matching one of the conditionals is sufficient for the assumption?

Is going through A and trying to eliminate answer choices a strategy we can apply to every single reading comprehension scenario where it's broken down into A and B.

Can we get a group going? I would appreciate this very much.

Hi, in Toronto, interested!

what if people are spending money to pay off their debts?