This happened to me 8 days before my exam. Went from getting -2 to -4 a section to a -13 on a reading section when I was super tired. The only thing you can do is take a few days off and refocus. You are burn out. If you are getting between 169-173, you aren't going to improve your knowledge in 2 weeks. What you will do is keep pushing harder as your scores go down and ruin your confidence. I took the break thought I did awful, scored just fine when scores released. You got this ! I promise you, you don't accidentally break into the 70s multiple times if you don't know what you are doing. Plus you already have a 165. That is your floor at this point. You will be just fine.

incorrect explanation. You forgot to change the ands to ors during your contraposition

what everyone is asking is why cant we use the contrapositive rule that has been drilled into our head on this conditional logic question to create a should not receive chain

Yes remember in an earlier lesson, they said to always ignore choices that attack the premises rather than the support relationship between premises and conclusion !

Ok im sorry but saying " I hope you recognize this is wrong" does not count as an explanation. Come on dude.... This explanation for C was just flat out lazy

Hands down the best explanation I've found on here. Way better than what is in the lessons. Thank you !!

Nope it's correct. Just means you chose to negate the other idea first !

Why aren't you putting "the only" in the group 1 chart when we've discussed it's apart of group 1?

I'm sorry but if we are all paying for this program, the writing needs to be atleast remotely legible. Scribbling random lines isn't helping anyone.

I'm sorry but this program is borderline unusable after this update. More than 70% of the questions are now gone for no reason and instead of written answers I have to waste time looking through videos? Who thought this was a good idea !?