For me, when I negated C, I realized it was the correct answer. If fish raised in traditional hatcheries were NOT timid in foraging the food then the argument isn't really there anymore. Why are the stimulated fish more likely to find food if both were equally bold or equally timid?
I mean it could be true that these office workers go home to work out. But the conclusion of the argument is that the office chair equipment are not properly designed to promote back health. The stimulus wants you to compare a group of people in office that uses said chairs and a group of people that do physical work and not use the chairs. Not really those who are physically active after their shift at work vs those who are physically active for their work.
Also this question was easier for me to see as a RRE question
I see what you're trying to say... I mean definitely the question isn't anyone's favorite but I guess the evil LSAT writers just expected you to connect "physical work" to "consistent physical exercise" without it being a big leap
Stuck between C and E and the only way I chose E was because it talked about actual lower back injuries. C talks about being encouraged to use techniques that reduce lower back stress... but like that person could go to work and still have a lower back injury. I could be encouraged to study the LSAT more by JY but doesn't mean I actually will or it will prevent me from getting a low score.
ohhh.. are we trying to get rid of the assumption that more exercise = better at math problem?
#help I"m confused by answer E. I understand the negation to be "The aerobic exercise group did not exercise more (So could be the same or less than weight group)". but HOW does this wreck the argument?
have to connect vegetation with drought... missed that
Honestly the LG is the most improvable once you start fool proofing each type of games. What helped me get section to 0-2 missed is start fool proofing the types of games like grouping for one night and then in & out the next day and repeat until you're sick of the game haha
RC is just hard for most people unless you're naturally fast and good at reading. Definitely as a business major, I didn't do enough critical and dense reading so RC has def been my weakest section and the longest to improve for me!
Mostly I was interrupted when my connection is lost which you should prepare no matter how great your WIFI is. I found that the Proctor U system is finicky and you can run into some connection issues per section which can throw your focus off. Other than that, foam ear plugs are fine and they try not to interrupt you too much.
sometimes my stupid simple brain lets me get questions like this right
replace = must've been somewhat of equals to be able to replace real faculty with TAs. Therefore, University would benefit from TAs in the same way they would from real faculty.
For me, PT 60s was my highest scores and weirdly into some 70s PT, my score tanked.. it also freaked me out and I started to study at like every moment I had which honestly stressed me out more. Just take some time off and come back into studying knowing that scores will fluctuate but that doesn't mean you forgot the fundamentals.
Can you please share your experience with ProctorU? my exam is on Thursday and really nervous about random tech difficulties
Thanks everyone that's actually really helpful!
Hi everyone. Does anyone have tips on consistency scoring so much lower than BR? It's just such a difference in scores and I know I have to do better on timing... but has anyone experienced this? And how did you overcome this? Honestly any advice would be great.
I'm gonna try to put this into my own words.
World view: Don't worry we can produce more food than the rate of population increase.
Malthus: Lol no actually you're wrong World, there's gonna be insufficient food that will doom us.
Author: Yeah you know what? I actually kind of agree with Malthus but kind of don't. I think RIGHT NOW we're okay on the food production but EVENTUALLY we're gonna be screwed and we're gonna experience what Malthus predicted.
Author's reasoning: Why do I think that? well because biodiversity will decrease which means we literally cannot produce food.
Question stem: So what is the role that the WORLD VIEW plays in the entire argument?
Answer choice D: It's a general fact that the argument offers reasons to believe will EVENTUALLY change. Yes, author thinks the World view will eventually change into Malthus view.
Answer choice C: It's an observation that supports Malthus' position. No no no, the world view and Malthus' view are very different. World view is saying chill out we're gonna be fine on food and Malthus' is like no we're gonna be short on food and it's gonna cause wars. So how could World view support Malthus' view?
Basically this question had me do mental gymnastics and I would definitely skip in during timed run.
something about A was calling my name but of course I was like "nah no way in hell that's the right answer" ugh
Basically, yes. But it's more so that main point questions in reading comp aren't summaries. You're not asked to summarize the entire passage. You're asked to find the main point which could be subtle and at the very end of the passage like this one. Other times it could be right in the beginning.
no weak sauce, we want strong sauce got it
soooooo the quorum can't last 30 minutes? ugh god Idk if I hate my realistic brain or the LSAT
You could submit all your applications but the school will just keep your application on file and "incomplete" until all of your LORs are in! So I'd honestly just wait to save yourself the back and forth communication from all the schools about incomplete application.