hmm, seems like a scam

Number 5.... so we have to assume that just because they had political aspirations or involvements that those involvements would more likely entail civil rights politics.

Right??? doesnt make any sense. has nothing to do with the info in the passage.

well above 350 is acceptable since it says upper extremeeeeee.

cap

I liked that

I pray to GD that the questions are as easy as this on my test day. Please GD give me the power! BZH.

i thought the stem says "the educator's" but it clearly says the educators'. somehow i still got this correct.

glaze

I negated A and found that it wasn't necessary because obviously the individual counseling helped them... it doesn't ruin the argument to say that the individual counseling helped them, especially because we're comparing it to something that also used individual counseling.

NEW CONCEPT IN THE CONCLUSION !!!!! AC must have the new concept. C'mon y'all. Baby Food.

This is the most baby food question of all time. Gd, please make these the types of high level questions I get on my exam day. BZH

I chose B cause I thought it was just simply saying that Y had less voters eligible to vote for him than P, which completely wrecks the argument and would make it more confusing.

I'm Jewish so this stimulus felt like reading my ABC's.

When that doesn't work, or the format of the arguments logic is overly convoluted. Go to the conclusion of the stimulus. If the stimulus conclusion says A should "solely" B then the conclusion in the AC must match that! (100% reliable)!!!!!!!! Gd bless the world.

Might be the easiest question type - let me explain. When reading the stimulus, all you have to do is identify the format of the argument, If A then B or B is required for A or Only B can cause A,,,, PER EVERY SENTENCE. Then find whichever damn AC matches, which AC uses the same exact format. If the stimulus says A→B, B→C, therefore A most C, the matching AC must have that exact same format. HUNT FOR THE EXACT SAME CHAINS(FORMAT). (99% reliable).

when the format of the logic of the argument is so convoluted like this, skip to the conclusion. Once you understand the format and quantifiers in the conclusion (most, any, etc.), scan the ACs and find the conclusion that matches. BH

dont be a moron. Read the stimulus like this: /A→B. A→C. C→/B. This makes it so much easier. I scanned past the ones that didn't have three subjects and I found that option B is the one that matches the format. /A→B. A→C. C→/B. LOCK IN! hope this helps.

cant we just eliminate the ACs that start off with accurate, since were looking for what is inaccurate? #feedback

how is this a level 5 difficulty, doesnt make any sense.

i chose d because she says she should not be held responsible-- future tense, which aligns with the AC saying she can learn to control it. therefore if she becomes able to control it, she will be held responsible. #feedback is this good

by far the most bullshit question ive ever encountered. get rid of it.

typical baby food question.

i chose D cause i thought that other foods fortified with vitamins would be an alternative way to get the vitamins in addition to eating less than the recommended amount of fruit. SAULGOOD tho.

im surprised they didnt trap with a CBA answer choice.