This lesson was sending me, fucking Pat!

Doing blind review is one of the most helpful and effective tools for me, I selected a wrong answer initially but caught my mistake during blind review so I feel like I'm actually understanding and am seeing improvements. Thanks!

Thank you for sharing your story and situation. Based on your history I'd say the accomodations are warranted.

Although ADHD is manifested often in a mental and/or emotional way, it's just as valid as something like being hard of vision or blind which happens to manifest in a physical way.

I understand that while working as a lawyer you will not have accomodations, but life is inherently unfair because all folks have different stories, backgrounds, privileges, and even luck!

I am but a mere stranger, and it sounds like you could totally take the exam without accomodations but as a fellow person who tried to raw dog my first exam- id happily report I applied for accomodations this second time around because I think a fair swing at bat never hurt anyone.

Wishing you the most luck and support on your journey 🙏🏽

October in the house!!!

so far so good. I am enjoying the breakdown of specifics in the curriculum which are helping me see the questions in a new light.

Question 2 got me. Would it be safe to say this question contains multiple conclusions but no support and therefore makes no argument?

I took my first LSAT in June without accommodations and totally feel you on the strain part! I'm interested in hearing what steps you take and how to successfully get needed accommodations. Thanks for starting this thread.

Many folks are interested, and so am I. I wonder what our best way to collaborate is :) ?