Really loving the Logic Links game as someone who needs to improve both accuracy and speed on conditional logic.
Some new terms in there that I have not found grouped in the lessons... what groups would "is enough", "is sufficient", "guarantees", and "is necessary" belong to?
@JacobKnapp01 I had the exact same issue with this. It seems so vague and like you could easily see other questions that argue it is not the answer exactly because it is so vague.
@AndyBerry Great idea, thank you for the tip and good luck in September!
Hello,
I finished the curriculum and started to take real RC sections and smaller sections. I find that I’m wildly overconfident in how I thought it was going to go, often not really questioning whether I got more than 1 wrong per section but still usually ending up in 160 range with obviously more than one wrong. With Blind Review, I can normally get almost all of them right.
How do you bridge the gap to what you score in Blind Review? It just feels a bit useless since it’s pretty easy to come up with the answers after having considerably more time with the passage. It’s clearly nice to figure out where you went wrong but it’s hard to see how valuable it is just to revisit the passage again and have additional time.
Does anyone have tips or other resources they used to help bridge the gap/get things right on the first attempt? I’m probably 2 months into studying with a goal of low 170s in September and October dates.
Working through the Foundations curriculum and just wondering what the recommended practice test frequency/cadence is afterwards. I see a lot of people reference their practice test scores and when to schedule based on how you are scoring, so I would be curious to hear what different people recommend.
I have two little ones and work full time so planning time windows to do timed practice test is challenging so I am just wondering how intentional you need to be about getting those tests in. It feels like by far the most important thing to do, but also a challenging thing to work in frequently.
Hello,
About 25 days into studying for the September + October LSAT. 60% through the foundations course, I genuinely feel like I am understanding most of the concepts (Lawgic the most challenging for me). I find I get a bunch of questions wrong in the drills because I don't read carefully enough and I am trying to move quickly. I don't know if it's my own impatience and limited time to study, but I want to make sure this doesn't continue on to when I am testing. Does anyone have tips for how to read more carefully while still answering the questions quick enough? It just scares me that going slow I will never be able to speed back up quickly enough to answer all the questions in a set in time.
@besrawi I also don't really understand, they suggested I BR one of the recent questions that I got correct..
@emill1517 Or maybe I just misunderstood the explanation for answer A initially being wrong, it's sufficiency necessity confusion not the reverse chain?
Can someone remind me of when you can move the chain backwards? I chained it out correctly and I understood it, but I'm having trouble remembering why/when we can do the chain backwards.
I.e. /downtown traffic decrease -> /profits increasing -> /more consumers downtown -> /cost of living decrease
@PowerUp_Tutoring I discovered yesterday there is a “reset response” button on the bottom… hard to see but it wipes anything away. No idea why you can’t just click on the same answer selected to take it off but hope this helps!