Lol I got everything right about the Question 4 -- except I assumed "valor in battle" --> /Benefit from Absence of War.

I have been out of school for a few years now and unsure if my professors would even remember my name lol. Wouldn't it make more sense to reach out in April or May when school is still in session for most Universities instead of July, in the heart of summer with vacations and everything else? I feel like professors would be more willing to respond in April or May.

Can someone explain the exact difference between this kind of context (setting the table) and just regular premise(s)? I'm having trouble differentiating the two.

Number 5 was a little confusing for me, only in the sense that the phrase "store's competitors claim" made it seem like that was the conclusion to an argument in itself. I guess my question would be: what differentiates an indicator like "claim" vs. "Consequently" as being the actual conclusion?

Can someone please explain how Q3 answer /GRI --> FofS is not the same thing as GRI --> /FofS? How are these not equivalent?

So I got 5/5 here versus 2/5 in the previous skill builder and I basically did it by thinking about these statements in terms of whatever is stronger = Necessary Condition and whatever is weaker = Sufficient Condition but is this an incorrect way to think about this? I don't want to start doing this all the time when it might lead me down the wrong path of Lawgic. Is this a correct way to consider sufficient --> necessary arguments or am I just making life more difficult for myself?