Well I ordered it thoroughly Barnes and t turns out the aren’t going to deliver on time. I could not find it on Amazon prime. The only person offering it has a 1month delivery schedule. Oh well... at least I am already in my top 2 ☺️🍾🎉

Can 7sage explain how to disqualify an answer that says intelligence requires CGObehavior?

Why do we conclude that the artwork is extrinsic. The argument only says If X, then extrinsic.

Why do we assume X (Not Intrinsic)

Never mind, got my answer. thanks

Thanks. How much are those and how do I get them? Will I have access to a digital version I can print whenever?

Also do you know if the 10 actual book Pt7x-PT81 has full PTs I can print for testing (and not pages combining both test and answer at the same time)

#20 was down to A and B. Is B too vague when it says carnivores and not carnivores who would prey on pronghorns?

#24... come on now. Hope the competition with the GRE will have them stop doing BS like that

yeah I will just go with a word or excel doc. I will only be using this to practice individual tough questions I have screenshot and organized by PT. I want to sneak in practice during lunch time without drawing attention from people using a scantron paper copy. Word/Excel will actually work better.

hahahahha I have been loosing it for some time now but not quite to the point of surviving off LSAT scantrons. I am looking for a fillable pdf of the answer sheet to discreetly do untimed practice whenever I get a chance. Paper copies attract too much attention and i am unlikely to feed myself a digital copy :)

excellent explanation, you should consider teaching law :)

Am I reading too much into #10 or is the question a bit tricky? "Mostly supported as in reported in the two passages" I thought it meant that the answer needs to be found independently in each one of the passages, not in both of them combined. I think I have seen other passages where they make the distinction clearer. Missed this one because I could not verify the correct answer in both passages.

very good point. "older" is relative and leaves room for a lot to assume in the LSAT world.

i thought the later studies weakened the argument from the first study, and thus an answer choice that weakens findings from the later studies indirectly strengthens the earlier study. Forgot that the conclusion the doctor drew from comparing earlier and later studies is faulty.

I saw this as a more complexed version of causation A---> B ---> C argument

Premise: A ---> B ---> C

Conclusion: D likely ---> E

We strengthen by closing the gap C ---> D

The argument jumped from the premise "greater proportion of precipitation" to the conclusion "mountain snowpack will melt"

A only gives a slightly different version of A--->C (it omits falls as rain, not snow)

B gives us B ---> D likely E

D gives us B --> E

Got this right. I only watched this video to make sense of the argument and I am still going wth lol

Good point on the "current technology" statement in answer B. But even we dropped that statement, won't answer B be false because the argument explicitly states "if we could" do it, in which case B attacks a premise of the argument instead of addressing a weakness in the argument?

A leads you to believe that the group in question is the same as the one mentioned in the stimulus, which it is not. The stimulus talks about rural people. Answer A talks about urban people and is thus not as much relevant to strengthen this conclusion.

Hold on.... Is not this a sufficient assumption questions? I thought "to be properly drawn" implied sufficient and not necessary?

I have missed this questions many times so a clarification would be much appreciated.

In the end, I justified C being incorrect because it says "psychotherapy" which could be conducted by people other than psychotherapists and thus not fall under the rule given in the argument. What do you guys think?

Could B be a necessary assumption to the argument?

Can anyone suggest any similar PT question to review?

I realize that the inference in my Assumption does not seem to follow from the pieces. can someone explain why the right answer is not Intelligence requires behavior?