- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
These motivational breaks genuinely suck and make me, and surely others, feel like crap. Every time I see one I hope it's a person who ACTUALLY wasn't doing good on their LSAT, not making a good enough score to get into Law School and their journey of how they did. For instance I'm talking scores below 150 (it's pretty general knowledge that having below a 150 makes it harder to get into Law School, no matter the GPA. Think, if I have a 145 LSAT but a 3.8 GPA do you think I'll get in? NO!! Because on the LSAT I showed little to no, or at least not enough ability to be able to think like a lawyer, which is the point of the test). But it's always someone who "wasn't doing as well as they'd hoped" GTFOH!!! We know good and well you're not telling us what you're actual score was is because you scored somewhere around 155-164 (Lets say I'm her and have a 158 and a 3.3 GPA. The majority of Law Schools will probably take her. Maybe no T-14 but she will get into one.) She also stated that people around her were telling her to stop because her score was more than enough. Now compare which one of those people needs more "motivation" the person who still can't get into any school cause they can't get over the 150 hump, or her who already has a near definite chance at getting into multiple Law Schools. And not to say that those people don't need motivation, we all do!! But for the most of us here, we probably aren't making scores where people are telling us to stop or don't worry about it cause we already have a good score, if anything, those people need less if any motivation at all. And it makes us not so smart guys kinda feel crappy because where's the motivation? We can't relate to someone and probably don't want to listen and receive motivation from someone who wasn't in the same boat (sure we might each be in our own similar canoe, but the only thing I have is a wooden paddle and she has a fully functioning motor). What would most likely be the best way to motivate the people in this course who REALLY need it would be to have people who were making closer to 140's, and their story of how they went from that to say maybe a 155+. That's motivation. How did THAT girl do it? That's who most of us want to hear from. Not the girl that was already making well enough to get into a top 50 school but "just knew they could do better" and then end up making less than 10 points from a "perfect" score. That's just not realistic for MOST of us on this course and on the LSAT in general.
So you wouldn't be able to say ui -> ue because it's just saying "the only way FOR IT TO BE ABLE TO EXIST is for it to be instantiated" and not "if it does, then it is". Right? I was hoping he would point it out in the video but I didn't catch it if he did.