- Joined
- Jul 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
Unfortunately, if you're scoring in the mid-140s on practice exams, you won't be able to score 170 on test day. I say keep drilling. What's important is being able to predict the answer before seeing the answer choices. I also suggest doing a deep review on your previous practice exams.
@BillyNotReally I think that's common. Answer choices aside, do you understand their process (i.e. what they do with the stimulus)? If you don't recognize their approach, try revisiting the curriculum, learning Lawgic, etc.
I'm so deeply sorry for your loss.
Grief completely scrambles our brains. It makes us slower, more forgetful, less able to retain information. It makes us perpetually exhausted. If you are set on applying this fall, maybe consider testing in August or September so you have some room to breathe. Take your time, the test will always be there.
Are you watching the video explanations for the practice questions?
On a computer. The 7Sage PrepTests simulate realistic conditions.
Usually because they are poor writers with little else on their resume.
In my opinion, the possibility of technical difficulties when remote testing is not worth the comfort/familiarity.
High scorers are usually practiced and comfortable with the exam. They are able to predict the answer before reading the answer choices. This comes with effective use of study time.
Why are you considering canceling your score before you鈥檝e seen it?
Do fewer practice tests. Do more timed sections and drilling with deep review afterwards.
@anjjredd Yes, that's right. The dates for the 2026-2027 cycle should be announced in February or March, just keep an eye out.
June is the end of this exam cycle. Exams will begin again in August. There will be exams in September, October, and November.
Don鈥檛 do more practice tests, re-read the curriculum. Look at your weakest question types in analytics and make sure you understand how to approach them.
You need to do a deep review of your missed questions. Also, if there are gaps in your knowledge of the foundational curriculum, please work through that.
@ErnestChen C doesn't attack the specific argument that newspaper sales will decline (i.e., newspaper buyers will cease buying newspapers in favor of electronic news services).
@clarkmichael B does not fit because the principle is about when it is wrong to play a practical joke, not when it is okay. B is swapping necessary and sufficient conditions.
@180 I actually thought that statement supported E because it suggested that the first proposal failed due to a lack of a comprehensive approach, and the second proposal just less so. Am I overthinking?
Hi, what is your strategy as far as reading/highlighting passages goes?
For RRE, you have to assume that all of the answer choices are true. You're trying to identify an explanation for a paradox presented in the stimulus. The answer choices are giving you new information to consider.
"Which one of the following, if true, contributes to a resolution of the apparent paradox?"
In this case, you're trying to explain why high-rises in cities with recent earthquakes have little damage if scientists currently believe that displacement pulses (to which high-rises are especially vulnerable) are present in all earthquakes according to computer models.
Yes, B casting doubt on the prediction that high-rise buildings are especially vulnerable to displacement pulses because it attacks the accuracy of the computer models which helped to make this prediction.