High scorers are usually practiced and comfortable with the exam. They are able to predict the answer before reading the answer choices. This comes with effective use of study time.

Why are you considering canceling your score before you’ve seen it?

Do fewer practice tests. Do more timed sections and drilling with deep review afterwards.

@anjjredd Yes, that's right. The dates for the 2026-2027 cycle should be announced in February or March, just keep an eye out.

June is the end of this exam cycle. Exams will begin again in August. There will be exams in September, October, and November.

Good luck!

Don’t do more practice tests, re-read the curriculum. Look at your weakest question types in analytics and make sure you understand how to approach them.

Analytics > Questions > Bookmarked filter

You need to do a deep review of your missed questions. Also, if there are gaps in your knowledge of the foundational curriculum, please work through that.

@ErnestChen C doesn't attack the specific argument that newspaper sales will decline (i.e., newspaper buyers will cease buying newspapers in favor of electronic news services).

@clarkmichael B does not fit because the principle is about when it is wrong to play a practical joke, not when it is okay. B is swapping necessary and sufficient conditions.

@180 I actually thought that statement supported E because it suggested that the first proposal failed due to a lack of a comprehensive approach, and the second proposal just less so. Am I overthinking?

Hi, what is your strategy as far as reading/highlighting passages goes?

Your score is improving.

@LSATgoat Thank you, this is a good explanation.

This one is simple when you understand it in terms of subset and superset relationships.

@stephlovesbirds I don't think there is a "correct" way to keep a wrong answer journal, as long as it helps you to understand the explanation for the correct answer and to identify the flaws in your own logic. You might need to revisit curriculum if the explanations aren't quite sticking.

@dyalasafi If you keep missing certain question types, go back into the curriculum and make sure you fully understand how to approach them. 7Sage will tell you your weak points in the Analytics tab.

Focus on:

1. Understanding what each question type is asking you to do and what approach you should take

2. Identifying when there are gaps in logic or fallacies

3. Knowing the rules of conditional logic (This is the most important part of the curriculum in my opinion)

No reason to feel discouraged, things will fall into place quickly. :)

@dyalasafi Have you tried keeping a wrong answer journal? When you miss a question, make sure you understand why you chose the answer you did (in other words, what LSAT "trick" you fell for for) and understand why the correct answer is the only correct one. Try doing drills of your weakest question types. Allow yourself unlimited time so you can diagram. Focus on building foundational skills and recognizing patterns.

Hi, don't feel discouraged. Have you read 7Sage's core curriculum?

I was between B and E, but ultimately chose E. The lack of sleep "was determined to contribute to the patient's condition" so we know that the goal is for the patient to sleep more. Even if B were true, those two hours of sleep are not helping her condition.

@NewStudent I have the same question.

I got this one right, but C was tempting. I think what helped was honing in on the argument.

@Anibal C Perez Okay fine, but the conclusion is worded in a way which suggests that both officers are eligible. 

I understand the bi-conditional. Doesn't the conclusion suggest that both officers are eligible, but only one of that should receive the award? Should receive is the same exact language used when describing the additional conditionals.