in this example, I thought we were comparing:

people who read label vs people who don't read label

That seems like a more accurate/intuitive way to read the sentence. We are comparing these two groups of people on the basis of their proportion of fat calories.

Another way to see this relationship is realize that there is at least one food, the almond, that is produced for domestic consumption and requires irrigation.

Applying that to any argument

Most jets fans are in NY. Most jets fans like hot dogs. Some people in New York like hot dogs.

We KNOW there are jets fans in New York and we also know that Jet's fans like hot dogs. They very well could be the people in in New York that like hot dogs, referenced in my conclusion. Therefore there are at least some people in NY that like hot dogs.

questions 6-8 don't relate to the previous lessons and might work better in a separate unit on "negating claims" in general#feedback