Anyone have tips for doing such questions in a timely manner? I feel going through each Ac takes a long time especially when having to use logic even if decently fluent

#help

.

I initially chose A but then thought C because C states that one month prior they were equally prior (meaning the groups were uncontrolled, thus randomized- or is this a wrong assumption?) Then I thought that the study accounted for this by controlling who eats nutritious breakfast and that's why we can say it was the breakfast that led to productivity #HELP !! I am confused now bc I contemplated between A and C.

BUT A also makes sense, I was naturally inclined towards it but now am trying to find a stronger reason to eliminate C.

This question stumped me bc i didnt do it in the format a->b->c

I did not finish reading all answer choices in the time limit set for this question. Am i just that slow of a reader or anyone else the same ? Any tips? Ik we can spend a little more on questions and that’s the ideal timeframe but I often need more time. How can I get better with timing ? #help

i understood the stimulus but tht answer choices stumped me, still a little confused despite the explanation. Have to star this one, defs not confident with it.

We are not getting opportunity to solve some of these questions bc it shows answer first before showing all options without. Any way quick view can be added for these questions? #feedback #help

no because uncomfortable means “not comfortable” therefore opposite of that is comfortable. That’s like if we had unselfish - in logic, it would be /S (not selfish), logical opposite would be selfish. That’s how JY did in foundational videos too!

exactly what i thought, even if were quick with it, it still takes a good chunk of time, i thought for me personally, it’d be a question i would skip

How do we know when to translate contrapositive or negation? Is it if there is quantifier it's negation ? logic then contrapositive? #help or will LSAT ask for specific or in general, do we just need to understand what makes more sense based on question and if we should find contrapositive or negation

/GR → PN (→) PA → D

/GR → D

for question 7, if there’s no conclusion made in the para, are we to assume the conclusion based on first stimulus (/GR) = last stimulus (D). #help

Confused on this question: #help #feedback

SAS → /P (The vote to grant Chancellor Palpatine emergency powers will not pass if Senator Amidala delivers her speech)

SAS → AAF (Amidala cannot deliver her speech unless the attempt to assassinate her fails. )

Does "Her assassins planted a bomb on her starship but unbeknownst to them, she was not on the ship when the explosive detonated" refer to the third premise "AAF"? If so, is it because we inferred from the statement that she was not there, so attempt failed.

Therefore refers to the line after "AAF"

Therefore, the vote to grant the Chancellor emergency powers will not pass. and we get /P

Confused on this question: #help #feedback

SAS → /P (The vote to grant Chancellor Palpatine emergency powers will not pass if Senator Amidala delivers her speech)

SAS → AAF (Amidala cannot deliver her speech unless the attempt to assassinate her fails. )

- I understand these above two statements and had gotten the same myself but I do not get the final conclusion statement, from what words was it compiled?

What is left was: "Her assassins planted a bomb on her starship but unbeknownst to them, she was not on the ship when the explosive detonated. Therefore, the vote to grant the Chancellor emergency powers will not pass."

*AAF

/P*

I am having troubles understanding what relative means and what absolute means-- does relative mean like when compared to the other statement that is the case? and absolute that the statement is concrete?