Tony: New vs old video cassette will decrease cost store has to pay and be more economical

Anna: No, new video cassette is small cost of total cost needed to pay. Royalty fee is most of the cost. So the price the store needs to pay won't be economical

How can Tony show Anna is wrong:

C - Since royalty fee will be half as much with the new cassette vs old cassette, actually now the price the store pays will be lower since royalty fee is half price. Thus new cassette is more economical than the old cassette since they would only need to pay half price now.

Who the hell is this speaker? This ain't JY

Good thing I was not taking the lsat in 1999

I found this one easiest by just negating answer E.

I TOOK THE BAIT

that's a good point

I went 16/17, wow I've got this down

Put government by consent in a box, and use that box throughout the argument instead of trying to figure out what it means. You can see by the discussion that knowing what that even meant doesn't really help.

or at least put the lsat question number so I can find it first and do it

Yes, you might get it right for the wrong reasons

site is down

Premise 1: A -> B

Premise 2: C -> D

Conclusion: A -> D

What's missing?

B->C; this is what you need to identify.

They'll usually throw a bunch of conditionals/trap answers choices that don't do that. In the stimulus they'll try to confuse by instead of giving you A -> B, it's /B -> /A.

These questions are quite hard, you can do it.

You're supposed to keep both in mind so you know what each modifier is modifying. In more confusing and longer sentences, you might find yourself confused about what "which" really is referring to, (i.e., is it the tourists? is it the building? is something else?). These examples are quite simple so it's pretty easy to know what "which" is referring to, but in longer paragraphs it will become more confusing.

BRICK BY BRICK

My ex was named Jimin, she needs to be arrested for trespassing into my life

If you watch them at 1.4x or 1.7x it's so good

I'm a chemist and I missed this question. I'm down badddd

If you can patch up a hole between the premise and conclusion, it may be better than picking a strengthen answer that seems kinda reiterate the premise and conclusion already (i.e. picking C in this case)

Hmmm is that really it? It's confusing since the answer key literally states must is the logical indicator.