i crossed them all out and im still convinced this isnt right because there isnt any evidence that the "events" are correlated at all. I was thinking the obvious answer is that the argument fails to acknowledge that people who work on a portable computer might just work more often because they have the means to bring their computer home with them. I don't understand how we can infer that earning more caused someone to have a laptop at their place of work? The only way I can see it working is if they bought PERSONAL laptops with their extra job money, but the stim doesn't say that.

i don't understand how we're supposed to know what overproduction of insulin does? Does it speed up the process or make it more efficienct or slow it down? I would think if it incessantly creates energy then it would use up energy more quickly so I chose A. is it saying body fat will build up more quickly? if they exercise at the same rate as people not on the diet aren't they using the energy that an overproduction of insulin would turn to fat?

how are non native english speakers supposed to do this if most of us don't even know what they mean by dissolve

i noticed the gap but i didnt read the full question stem and chose D for some reason

i didn't choose D because I thought we couldn't assume which way the temperature goes? It just says it differs by at least 2 degrees, so are we supposed to assume that it's 2 degrees warmer??

I still don't understand why C is wrong. If the parasites latch on to get nourishment, then if the stingrays aren't nourished enough because of pollution, then that would explain why they don't have parasites? I still see this as explaining the discrepancy. Can someone help? None of the answers online explain this.

do you think it would be worth it/strategic to skip whole passages that will take a while so we can do easier ones to get more points (saving comparative for last for example) and have more time at the end to work out the tough ones or does that not make sense?

i counted out A because I took all harm to be equal :( the fact that the stim says minor interactions can be harmful messed me up

on the test should we try to find the main point/purpose questions first? or does it not really matter as long as we're strategic about skipping ones we don't know?

anyone else trying to cram all of these new lessons before next week lol

HI!

this is great I hope I have time to go through these resources before aug 8th

it assumes that subsidizing daycare is the only way for governments to show interest in well-being

yup i just got it too even though i watched an explanation video less than 10 minutes ago. why hasn't this been fixed yet

lmaoooo i loved that part

this was tricky I had B and switched to A

because in the question with schools and cost the correct assumption was that the group of people being talked about ACTUALLY APPLIED to the phenomenon mentioned.

so B is wrong because if you negate it it doesn't destroy the argument since the argument is a hypothetical? it doesn't matter if we can ACTUALLY convert heat into energy, because the conclusion is a conditional?? it seems like if we negate B it would render the argument invalid, but not if the argument is only a hypothetical?

it doesn't have anything to do with the materials that are considered waste, which is what the conclusion is about

this one was easy because none of the other answers were even relevant

the question from that video is actually coming up lol

yes love his vids

when you negate it, the argument will not follow. The argument rests on the assumption that the necessary is true, so if the necessary becomes false, the conclusion cannot follow. :)

is E sufficient but not necessary? I had C and changed to E in BR because i thought negating it would show that if the DNA are similar they would have had to interbreed and if they're different they wouldn't have?

not colette but I did like blood and guts in high school!