User Avatar
jjosep04
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
jjosep04
Thursday, May 22 2025

I GOT THIS RIGHT (40seconds):

TIP: look out for Major premise/subconclusions! LSAT will try trick you to stop reading after u find that. Then theyll hide the MC at the end.

---------------------------------------------

MY APPROACH: I looked at the support relationship between the 2 conclusions presented. The one that didnt support (as a premise) for the other, was the Main Conclusion!

[i.e. the subconclusion - supported the main conclusion, but not vise versa, so i knew]

--------------------------------------------

I posted the above! for anyone who might need it. :) :) :)

Trust me i thought i wasnt good at these and i am someone whos usually confused. but referring back to the lesson like it was second hand saved me. the basics really are EVERYTHING!!

(its giving.... the karate kid movie... if ykyk)

7
User Avatar
jjosep04
Thursday, May 22 2025

good googly moogly

30
User Avatar
jjosep04
Thursday, May 22 2025

#feedback

Bring back the videos!! they helped to make the information more digestible... almost like a friend was telling me something. They stuck in my brain and when it came to applying it to practice questions I could hear the conversation in my head

27
User Avatar
jjosep04
Thursday, May 08 2025

QUESTION 1 - am I wrong?

This is how i framed it instead;

A --> (NC and /OC4+) contrap: /NC or OC4+ ---> /A

M --> A --> /OC4+

-----------------------

therefore /OC4+

#feedback

0
User Avatar
jjosep04
Monday, May 05 2025

#feedback

Question 5

I am confused.

I thought that we are suppose to take things literally. Because we were told that LSAT writters never make mistakes and are intentional with their words. When are we suppose to know when we can make assumptions and when we cannot?

"Elites" can be anyone? There is no indication that it means "politicians"

6
User Avatar
jjosep04
Thursday, May 01 2025

I think you wrote the same thing as the answer. It does matter as long as the Necessary condition is negated.

6
User Avatar
jjosep04
Wednesday, Apr 30 2025

Hi, I agree to that part.... but for Q1 I am confused because they are similar to other P+C questions in which he said that we cant make assumptions.

The assumption here being that /(health deteriorates) then you do physical exercise. Cant we assume that the author never specified that just because your health is good its only because of exercise?

0
User Avatar
jjosep04
Wednesday, Apr 23 2025

I did similar to you but...

I did very cold days VS. NOT very cold days

Saying "warm" i took as an assumption? because it could just be cold

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?