I GOT THIS RIGHT (40seconds):

TIP: look out for Major premise/subconclusions! LSAT will try trick you to stop reading after u find that. Then theyll hide the MC at the end.

---------------------------------------------

MY APPROACH: I looked at the support relationship between the 2 conclusions presented. The one that didnt support (as a premise) for the other, was the Main Conclusion!

[i.e. the subconclusion - supported the main conclusion, but not vise versa, so i knew]

--------------------------------------------

I posted the above! for anyone who might need it. :) :) :)

Trust me i thought i wasnt good at these and i am someone whos usually confused. but referring back to the lesson like it was second hand saved me. the basics really are EVERYTHING!!

(its giving.... the karate kid movie... if ykyk)

good googly moogly

#feedback

Bring back the videos!! they helped to make the information more digestible... almost like a friend was telling me something. They stuck in my brain and when it came to applying it to practice questions I could hear the conversation in my head

QUESTION 1 - am I wrong?

This is how i framed it instead;

A --> (NC and /OC4+) contrap: /NC or OC4+ ---> /A

M --> A --> /OC4+

-----------------------

therefore /OC4+

#feedback

#feedback

Question 5

I am confused.

I thought that we are suppose to take things literally. Because we were told that LSAT writters never make mistakes and are intentional with their words. When are we suppose to know when we can make assumptions and when we cannot?

"Elites" can be anyone? There is no indication that it means "politicians"