I though D is self-contradictory, because I thought hiring new worker is part of the criteria of recovery.

Then I went back to re-read the stim, and realize D is in fact not self-contradictory. "Hiring additional worker" appears in the sentence only to qualify "business activity expansion", it was put there to confuse us. It won't change the meaning of the sentence at all even if it was taken out. Even if business owners all decide not to make the needs met immediately, it won't disqualify a recovery. The two criteria of recovery is "increase in costumer spending" and "business activity expansion", "hiring additional worker" is not a criterion.

Sometimes, questions like this leave me wondering if JY only comes up with explanation after he knows the correct answer... Alas

Earlier video JY said Principle Questions are quite different from Pseudo Sufficient Assumption Questions. But now JY says they are basically mirror questions?

Q23 I chose A because I confused what is the practical consequence and what is the theoretical consideration... I thought the new constitutional arrangement in theory solves the problem but in reality it doesn't for it simply shift the sovereignty problem to be of parliament now.

Could anyone share how you distinguish which is practical and which is theoretical? Thank you

#help (added by Admin)

I mistakenly understood C as "Most of the time, dead sea creatures won't wreak ecological havoc"/" most of the time, sea creatures can only wreak ecological havoc if they are alive". But C is far beyond that. C is "most of the time, sea creature can only wreak ecological havoc if they were deposited by ship tanks and were alive. " and thus marched into the territory as unnecessary.

When I first did this question, I was confused trying to figure out whether WLW belong to the category of PA or SrbL. Then I realized the only meaning of WLW in this argument is to show that some of WLW can lead to LRAL.

For me the difficulty for this question is to realize it is different for a belief to be (objectively) not harmful vs a belief to be believed to be not harmful.

My way to solve it:

premises:

no SSS;

ETC -> ETIH.

conclusion:

able to determine -> ETIH

What is lacking: able to determine -> ETC

and premise of no SSS shows that we need to add "unless SSS (or else the premise won't include a statement about no SSS)"

able to determine -> ETC unless SSS

which can be simplified as: able to determine -> ETC or SSS

Sometimes JY imagines mistakes that nobody makes, while he precisely deems the wrong AC I selected as stupid without providing an explanation... T^T

I wonder for 15, who actually regards the question as asking which of the following question the author answered yes, LOL

The difficulty is simply from the fact that all the ACs are so similar, so when you get to E, it is so hard to read carefully and spot that they twisted the first sentence and thus created a false conditional reference...

For NA questions bare minimum is enough! AC that doing too much is the trickiest trap, because they are unnecessarily for NA questions!!!

This question shows the importance of recognizing question type!!!

I thought the blank will functions as an part of explanation why tussock moths could be beneficial where the forest is unnaturally crowded with immature trees. I did not expect the blank need to play the role of a independent factor that make the beneficial situation apply to "most of this forest"......

"If authors from that tradition use the work in at least one of three ways" clearly shows world literature are measured by how other authors use/see it, so the world literature affects the development of various nations of literature.

I was confused because I totally overlooked this clause and thus didn't realize the "authors from that tradition" refers to other authors that being influenced by the one work being judged whether to be world literature.

Q 16, B is not as good as C, because the sentence said "her thematic storytelling memory process sift and reconstruct the essential elements of personally remembered stories", it means she uses elements from these personally remembered stories, sifts and reconstructs them. It indicates that these personally remembered stories are not already thematically organized, because they were raw materials, not organized thematically yet. They only becomes thematically organized after the process of sifting and reconstruction.

What would be an example of A? Thank you!

25 -E So the reason why E is wrong is because the study of Vernon was not described, the passage only mentioned her discovery without describing the study itself?