@markymymarkymark768 fantastic explanation right here

dumbahhh question lol

hard afffff

Thought D was wrong because it makes the general statement of "news reports are unlikely..." But the stimulus makes a specific modifier that these news reports are pessimistic. Guess I overthought it.

@tarapg2901 No definitely not. A lot of the time (maybe even most of the time) the conclusion actually is identifiable by keywords. Its important though to always double check to make sure the premises actually support the statement that follows the indicator.

can't you just say

For Beresford residents:

Pet allowed -> Medical purpose

or

~Medical purpose -> ~pet allowed

I feel like all the approaches over complicate this issue if you can just translate using the original negate sufficient rules from earlier

Interested

I'm interested!

Interested!