It is what it is.

This was helpful!

That is premised on an assumption that there are only two contrasting phenomenon. What happens when there are three? For example, most girls like pink. There may be more than two colors involved and therefore, 50% may not necessary mean most. e.g 4 like pink, 3 like gold, 3 like yellow. To me, then "most" in this case means more than 33.33%. And, that negates this assertion. For purposes of LSAT, I will however assume that there are only two contrasting phenomenon and assume that most means more than 50% unless otherwise stated.

The other issue arises in such a case: Most men like black, Most women like black. Does that mean that some women are men or most men are women? No, it doesn't.

I think some students should be interpreted to mean more than one so the lower band should actually be 2 and not one because one only means "one student" and yet some students (being in plural) means more than one.

I though that one shouldn't make assumptions in an LSAT exam.

There's an assumption that politicians are part of the elite, but of late, we have seen politicians who are not even part of the elite> I do not want to mention names of felons.

Nice!

This is insightful. Besides the definition, I have noted that some arguments can to be more persuasive than strong yet others can be stronger but less persuasive. To me, there can also be those that are both strong and persuasive.

I am scheduled for my LSAT this month. I am a first timer giving it a first shot. Any advice?