@-1

I think the two LR sections are about average, LG is rather easier, except the third one was a bit weird though the last one was easy. For some reason I didn’t do as well as I’d hope in RC (probably because I was mentally exhausted in section 5)...

@ said:

Does anyone know a similar PT game to Scheduling 5 people over 7 months and computer repair?

Thank you

I think there was game about scheduling 6 months of work (at two different places) over a period of 9 months. forgot which PT this was on, either C2 (Jan 2016) or PT 86 or 85?

I think the rodent one is the real one (26) questions!

A would be correct if the stimulus were written like this

Arguing that history provide an undistorted view of the past is like saying that one can make an accurate conception of one's environment on the basis of a single momentary perception...

congrats on the acceptance and the full ride!!

Congrats! Thank you for sharing this story! Best of luck with the other 6 schools!

please correct me if I am wrong. Here is how I got the correct answer:

I see the context as the first premise giving us a bi-conditional:

R (an object is real) EPST(explained by scientific theory)

The second premise actually tells us two things:

1.There are objects explained by scientific theory(EPST) and 2. They are TG (on theoretical ground).

Thus, if we can find an answer choice showing that if something is on theoretical ground then they are not real (TG ---> ~R), then we will be able to show that the approach is flawed.

since having the first is biconditional, and R would give us EPST.

Combining with the second premise, we would then have (EPST and ~EPST), which is a contradiction!

for those that chose E for question 9 (like myself). this experience refers to the "common experience of sadness" that people experience rather than their common experience relating to west African music.

hope this helps

that happened to me as well...

removed

Here is my reasoning for the question

A is correct by affirming the necessary assumption of the theory that the author is trying to attack

B is correct by weakening the author's premise that no painting depict sea animal

C (incorrect) because by affirming that there are land animals in the painting, the answer choice does nothing to either support the original theory or weaken the premise of the author since you can depict land animal for all kinds of reasons

D introduced new evidence that (seemingly?) attacks the author's premise that you need to eat sea animal while traveling

E renders the premise useless by indicating that the painters did not travel

So the lead actor understudy one is experimental for LG?

6 times LSAT over a span of 5 year. went to graduate school and worked in the mean time. Now at a T6 law school and got offers from V20 law firms. You can do it and it might just take one more try. work with JY and all the wonderful tutors on 7 Sage. remember, if you think law school is the right choice, don't let an unsatisfying LSAT score discourage you. It is not a test for everyone, and it is no way a good indicator of your performance at the law school. you can still shine through during your first year even a at a lower ranking law school (and you can always transfer). Best of luck and I know you can do it!!

Thanks Nicole! Let's do it guys!!!

Question 12 is a good lesson for me. I eliminated C right off the bat thinking that passage has not mentioned Spanish poets' uncritical attitude towards Spanish Language. Looking back, it does say that "Spanish poets seem to take their language for granted" in the second paragraph and by linking that with the conservatism in the third paragraph you can find the C as the right answer choice.