I keep hearing conflicting answers:
I know in some applicaitons it's just Latino, but what about others when they want you to be specific.
I keep hearing conflicting answers:
I know in some applicaitons it's just Latino, but what about others when they want you to be specific.
I am applying this month as a URM 3.47/169, though I feel that If I try again on September I get a better chance. But is this allowed?
Note: Using 7sage URM + ED (haven't decided who to ED yet)
The link is: 
It's supposed to work in case you don't see it.
(----- Using 7sage Predictor(/p)
I know that GPA addendum's are supposed to short but I believe I have legitimate concerns
2.A. I stayed in my house during periods of DACA expiration, Broward College didn't give me accommodation as an "undocumented illegal" for turning in work late/online (this was in 2014 - 2016)
Second question: Does DACA help out in diversity to increase chances?
I went from 161 to 169 in two months so why not
@mp1639658 said:
at least you got that, I stayed the same with no improvement. Still 154
If you need LG help dm me
Thank you 7sage community for all the help, went from a 161 to 169. Not 170 but it's perfect in my book
Going to do the consulting hours now for the essays
I want to apply this month since the earlier the better, but I feel I did better on my LSAT
Does anyone know the style that it was with the elevators/luxury? I couldn't crack it with one of the rules
#help
Got all right EXCEPT 23
23 is BS
We can't assume that it's the most, most means out of every single one Chlorine reigns supreme
We can't know 100% for sure
What if there is 100 other types BUT Chlorine hurts in terms of quantity since that is what we mostly use in production. So it could be weak because it's not that it's the worst, but because we make so much then it is the biggest concern
@davidbusis895 said:
Hi all—
Yes, we updated the predictor this week. @zizhuchen829 , unfortunately, we do expect your chances to be lower at some schools with the new model. @annagoldsmith101245 , we're looking into a possible bug, so please post or email Student Service studentservice@davidbusis895.com if you notice results that look wrong to you.
To confirm the link on the admissions for the predictor?
#help
Isn't JY doing a wrong sufficient indicator with his lawgic
I got durable --most---> sedantry
then he says NOT durable --most-> sedantry
I got approved to take the November 23rd test after the technical disaster that happened.
Got 161 in August, tried again with this one in November and bombed hard (will see if I can appeal the tech issues like everyone else)
I don't think I have what it takes anymore after two years of studying.
I know I shouldn't be angry at a 80th percentile score, considering Hispanics get below 150, (don't wanna even imagine Autists or DACA recipients)
I just wanna say I'm glad for everyone who helped me when I asked hundreds of questions!
Apologies if you see me upset with how emotional I really felt about this. ASD people can get severe emotional reaction and for me getting wrong questions was really bad for me. I just got upset that I didn't get my goal of 163 to get the medium for UF in fear that this will lower my chances (161, URM, 3.47 CAS GPA)
Anyways, on my way to do ED for University of FL lol
Can anyone explain how it's B and not D
I broke it down like this
I thought of it as MC for the end because it would justify why they did all this
yup looking back with 20/20 hindsight
caused --> effect
This helps, not 100% perfect but helps
Crazy to see based on the percentages of people that got it right from question 1 through 5 is in total 52%
The LSAT is getting harder on purpose
way Broader than B
can't prove on the exception, but we can prove B
#help
I'm confused
whether or not it was the cause does not mean it's ineffective
We are looking for a PSA that denotes this --> NOT effective
How does B do that
It just says in the absense it would have occured, but the MC is talking that who cares its ineffective
How i see it months later
ITS VULNERABLE TO CRITICISM
Now being a hypocrite isn't a fallacy, but it sure is a way to be criticized
EX: MEAT BAD
Eats meat
Is what I did hurts my argument, no but it can cause people to criticize me
Got this through POE because it's implied for person B to have the agreement
Thank you, though is it possible that if I accept in this cycle, can I try again the next cycle?