If you’ve scored a 170 or higher on a fresh PT, let me know if you’re interested!
Edit: if you're in that score range, message me and i'll send you a link to our Discord server
this is great! thank you!
I like that one, Dillon. I may have to use it sometime.
If you’ve scored a 170 or higher on a fresh PT, let me know if you’re interested!
Edit: if you're in that score range, message me and i'll send you a link to our Discord server
Great post, JY. Will 7Sage's digital tester allow us to pull up any PT that we've purchased from 7Sage? Will there be other formats available, such as individual sections? Any plans to incorporate analytics? Would be great to see how much time was spent on individual LR questions, for example. Thanks!
What are the pros/cons?
Hey Alex, please add me as well!
great work, especially coming back from your second take. you won!
@ said:
Yes- and saying that something is "necessary and sufficient" is exactly the same as saying something is "sufficient and necessary"
A certain philosopher on PT 69 would like to have a word about this!
Curious to hear everyone's thoughts!
Great job! Congrats
Shut up and take my money!
if your numbers aren't at/near their medians i would wager it was a mass email
Opened back up! DM me if you’re interested!
Let's keep our heads in the game by taking a moment to acknowledge our LSAT victories (small or large)!
I'll get the ball rolling:
1) I've gotten a bit faster at LG
2) I've identified areas to improve
3) I experience less anxiety during timed conditions
Looking to work with an online study buddy in prep for Oct., Also open to a small study group, maybe 3 people max.
Currently scoring in 160s, aiming for 170. Would like to work with someone/people in a similar or higher score range to talk strategies and thought processes, bounce ideas and questions off of each other, etc.
Also, I'd be interested in regularly answering questions from someone who's driven and scoring below the 150s.
Thanks!
What are some common traits of applicants who "punch above their numbers"?
"Force" on one sock. "User" on the other.
"Kamehame-" on one sock. "HAAA" on the other.
"Therefore NOTHING!" - JY
thanks everyone!
@ A couple years off and on
Great work!!!
143 to 173
Thank you JY, I couldn't have done it without 7Sage. And a big thank you to Jonathan Wang, Mike Kim, Daniel Sieradzki, Josh Aldy, Patrick Tyrell, Graeme, Alex, the people in my study group, and many others.

@ lol right? hey future lawyers, wanna make a quick buck? just break some copyright law(s) and those NDAs you signed and make sure to talk about it on this website
not unless you get accommodations
Your glaring immaturity is second only to your ignorance.
I think there's still value in using paper, as long as you're getting enough practice on the digital format too.
Can some of you awesome people weigh in on statistical reasoning as it's used in the LSAT? For example, PT 18 S2 Q4. Specifically, things like probability or likelihood trip me up. Any resources or explanations would be appreciated! Thanks!
@ said:
@ said:
Hey Alex, please add me as well!
You got it, dude!
Thanks brotha! Any idea what the schedule will look like? For example: two PTs a week from PT 35 and up?