Is E wrong because it doesn’t mention small findings and only just news being dramatic as well?

Bruh first time i accidentally clicked the wrong AC when I had the right AC in my brain

Wait why would the trap version of answer choice D be sufficient but not necessary?

Wait why does PSA and SA have weaker Answer choices than NA?

HOW DO U KNOW whether to map or not? Bc the previous one u don’t map? HELP

Wait why is it not C?

Wait why is it B and not D?

Yes im not a bio major but this was the first time I got a high - difficulty question right. We ate

I always get the easy questions right and the hard ones 3 bubbles and up, WRONG :(

I got confused between B and E. Any tips on how to choose b next time?

Wait so ‘some’ and ‘Most’ can technically be 100% (all)?

Question: so sufficient means that it is enough to be something, but it is not necessary. So sufficient means that it can mean something but it won’t always need to have it?

For question 24, how is it not C, is it not resolving a controversy when it says “historians traditionally argued”

I thought it was not B because it said they’d have to pay it with “claims” but is not that different from negatively impacting the spread of cost of risk of all cardholders in the stimulus? Since stimulus is taking about negative results for all cardholders and B is not descriptive with who is getting risk

Wait I still don’t get why it’s not C

I can low key see that “incomplete recollection” might be a problem that can be seen in passage because of the “not studied throughly” part, but I guess it is not the ideal answer but its the BEST answer compared to the other choices

Wait for B, it can’t be a general conclusion from the examples of research and the maturing age of 17? Why? Would it work if the examples were like “a child has same moral abilities as an adult.” I’m confused what could have worked as an example and why the passage did not have the examples that would make up a general conclusion

Thank you!!

It is really confusing. Maybe i wish there were descriptions of each of the question tags because otherwise, the question tags don’t mean anything or ring a bell for someone beginning to study the LSAT

I think E was a not bad answer, but D totally kills out the chance of Gregory’s argument. And I guess in the passage, it did not say anything about how being very small may be large enough to make handwriting reliable enough?

Is D wrong since it is not about cause and effect, and more of the conductor’s biased choice, that can be changed again? Also, the ‘should’ word makes it seem like the there is a lack of clarity on whether a harp will or will not play.

Yeah, me too. Wait so the conclusion can be out of order? It just needs to have the same logical structure even though the conclusion is in the beginning unlike the stimulus?

What is that ‘-c’ representing for you in the equation?

Yeah. I stilll don’t get it

Yes