Enough for today 🥲

LSAT takeaway

Whenever you see:

If A → B

and the argument reasons:

Not A (or A is unlikely) → Not B (or B is unlikely)

an alarm should go off.

This is the classic flaw of treating a sufficient condition as though it were necessary (a probabilistic version of denying the antecedent).

Bailey is great!

@Catpop thank you

Hi,

Does (fewer) also includes none or 0?

Great lesson. Thank you

hello,

Does context information are usually at the beginning of the arguments?