How come "discover tombs of pharaohs once thought to be mythical" is a modifier of help and not archeologists? I would think the modifier attaches to archeologists because it's closer to it.

Along the support and assumption spectrum, is it strong premises that leave no assumption what creates strong, must be true arguments. Or is the the few or lack of assumptions that make a strong argument? (Are premises or assumption more important to making a strong argument?)

I was wondering if "4. All adorable things are cute," is considered a subconclusion? Or is it just considered a major premise? (I noticed that 3. is considered both subconclusion and major premise)

I'm experimenting with Formal Argument #5, is this valid?

Most bars that serve wine also serve fancy cocktails. All bars that serve wine play loud music. Therefore, most bars that serve serve fancy cocktails play loud music.

SW--m-->SFC

SW---->PLM

therefore,

SFC---m-->PLM

Could someone please show me how to solve problem #3 using Group 4 indicators? I can't seem to get the same answers using Group 3 indicators. Using the "no" rule, I get truths--->/written. I negated the written and inserted truths as sufficient. However, the correct formula is /truth--->/written. Help would be greatly appreciated.