at first i hated them now I can't wait for the section.
I feel really in "flow" when i do logic games and rarely ever dread it unlike LR and RC.
Anyone else feel this way?
so we are trying to weaken the authors conclusion? that it's not a speaking staff? the warriors mace is irrelevant? or do we need to weaken that as well?
can someone please draw this out for me and all the possible things we can conclude? i am struggling to under jy's drawings. #help
this explanation literally made no sense :( #help
tricky lsat with answer choice b by switching the conclusion and the premise!!!
The explanation for why C is wrong falls short.. can someone help explain why its not the right answer? i feel like C is more specific to the stim while B is bringing up the "other" #help
Would you also say that B is incorrect because its an "any" statement and the stim is about a "some" statement? #help
The way i thought about A was that prices in general rose in Australia so the increase income for the sheep farmers didn't do much due to the high costs. but now I see that it's not what answer choice A is saying. That was my prephrase and I just made it fit into A. I see answer choice C is way better and a classic LSAT answer choice.
I got it right on BR because i had the time to read thoroughly. I really need to work on my timing so i have more time for harder questions like this
honestly the LR sections of preptest 75 kilt me
time and time again i am reminded to focus on the conclusion of the argument! so simple yet so hard to get it through my thick skull .
this passage was so easy during BR but during timed conditions i totally panicked. need to be better at staying calm during timed conditions. Any tips? I meditate during the day but any other tips/ideas to staying calm during timed conditions?
if the sufficient is satisfied then the rule is triggered and the necessary is satisfied.
But yes if there is a sufficient condition ---> necessary condition then it leads to the necessary condition. not sure if that is your question!
What wording weirded you out? the "if" is the sufficient and the "will" is the necessary
or if you mean in answer choice B - it's just stating that the argument concluded the necessary without the sufficient being triggered.
this argument vs general claim was so helpful!
why did i think E was a NA answer choice :(
4 correct B's in a rowwwwww. highschool me would be shakin in ma boots.
i just looked up what a balloon valance is. hideous lol
at first i hated them now I can't wait for the section.
I feel really in "flow" when i do logic games and rarely ever dread it unlike LR and RC.
Anyone else feel this way?
i hate when i miss a question because i have my flaw hat on! ughhhh
so just so i understand we are never suppose to question the premises in flaw questions? we should take what the premise says as truth? #help
I got this through POE because i felt like all the answer choices were so irrelevant to the argument.
I still don't get why A is wrong #help