3/5 on medium :( NA is such a killer for me

ughhhhh I had E the whole time and changed it to B last second because I doubted myself :(((((

Could someone explain this in a more succinct way? I'm very confused :(

This section has been so discouraging :(

I've started doing that on flaw questions that confuse me and my accuracy has improved HAHA

these questions are such a nightmare for me :( feeling defeated

Why do I tend to find level 4&5s of SA easier than Level 3?? I often get level 3 wrong but don't have as many issues with 4&5. Any suggestions/advice?

I'd suggest starting with a full PT just to get a feel for where you're at score wise right now. It helps to have that baseline.

Then, get back into your untimed and timed drills, targeting your weak spots.

Ugh I read the rules of this wrong and thought they were exclusive (either exemplary OR saved a life). I have to keep reminding myself to slow down because I would have chosen the correct answer otherwise.

Our issue here is that we don't know if TMD causes children harm.

E assumes that it's already settled, and tries to establish a relationship that doesn't exist in the stimulus (see edited stimulus example in the explanation)

C has 2 necessary conditions. If the premises in the stimulus fail one of those conditions, then the use of TMD is not acceptable.

Condition 1: The pesticide is used for the intended purpose.

Stimulus meets this criteria. TMD is intended to be and actually used on peaches.

Condition 2: Not shown to harm any portion of the population

The premises only say we do not know if TMD is harmful to children. Therefore, it can harm some portion of the population. Premises fail this condition, and make TMD use unacceptable.

Hope this helps!

To me, E says that Hagerle should not have apologized to the physician. But the argument that's being made is that Hagerle should apologize to the counselor because they apologized to the physician.

More intuitively, I read that answer choice and think "I don't know if Hagerle can apologize to everyone", so that makes the scope too wide for what we're looking for.

Hope this helps!

Do you all always read through the full explanation/watch the full video? Sometimes they're so drawn out and convoluted I just read the summary at the end to get the idea of what I did right/wrong.