I initially chose (A) but changed my answer during BR because I felt like (A), although addresses the premise the best, isn't so air tight that it leads to the conclusion that the manager, too, is to blame.

In order to make (A) more tight, I think it should have said something along the line of, "If a manager does not take foreseeable problems into account when making decisions, he/she is to blame when a problem rises from that decision."

I understand why all the other answer choices are wrong, but is (A) still the right answer because this is a principle question so the argument does not need to reach the level of validity?

Does anybody have an idea as to what answer choice B means? lol

I am also interested! Thanks for organizing :)

A pencil war LOL thanks JY for keeping my LSAT study entertaining

A great playlist. Thanks!

@ this is a great explanation! Really helped clear things up for me. I have a question regarding answer choice (E), if you don't mind helping me out.

Answer choice (E) says, "Radical environmentalists advocate positions without regard for factual support or economic feasibility," and JY, in his video explanation for this question, said that this is a reiteration of the first sentence in the stimulus ("The positions advanced by radical environmentalists often contain hypotheses that are false and proposals that are economically infeasible."). I personally thought that answer choice (E) is unsupported by the stimulus because we just know that radical environmentalists' positions often contain false hypotheses and proposals that are economically infeasible, but I didn't think that was good enough for us to accept (E) as true (that they advocate positions with no regard for factual support or economic feasibility). What do you think?

Sorry for this verbose question. Really interested in knowing what you think!

@ I'm also studying for the LSAT in Korea! Good to know that a fellow LSATer is around :)

Thanks so much for organizing all this :D