@ So weird. I called LSAC and they said that unless you went to multiple schools or transferred, your "Degree (Summary) GPA" and "Cumulative GPA" should be exactly the same.
My undergrad GPA on my transcript is listed as a 3.8 but both my "Cumulative GPA" and my "Degree (Summary) GPA" is listed as a 3.4. I know that 3.4 is my LSAC GPA since I retook a couple of courses, but I thought my "Degree (Summary) GPA" should be a 3.8
Sigh I don't know who's right, LSAC has been known to give inaccurate information before. Are your GPA's different and did you happen to attend multiple schools? Would appreciate your response!
@ Hi when do you think you can give us an update?
@ Is your degree summary gpa the same as your cumulative gpa? mine is exactly the same on lsac. My degree GPA should be much higher than my LSAC gpa
How can the new parking garage have been the cause of the reduction in fines? It says the fines were implemented 6 months ago to help pay for the garage that "had just opened" Was the garage already built 6 months ago? I interpreted it that the garage came AFTER the fines were implemented since you need the money to build it. #help
@ You can take the LSAT writing on the same page on LSAC where you check your scores. There are no live proctors during the writing part. They video record the entire session instead and there are instructions that ask you to show your surroundings to the camera much like the FLEX exam.
Mistaken reversal is simply when you forget to negate an argument. If stimulus states A --> B, a mistaken reversal of this would be: B --> A. If you negated the conditions to get /B --> /A, this would be correct, and no longer a mistaken reversal. Hope that helps.
Applying the negation test to answer choice (C) didn't completely wreck the argument yet it's still the necessary assumption. I'm guessing it has something to do with the fact that it also serves as the sufficient assumption as JY pointed out. But shouldn't necessary assumptions always invalidate the argument when negated? #help
"X is necessary for A" essentially means "A requires X": A --> X
In conditional language "X necessarily results from A" also means A --> X, since if A occurs, X must also necessarily occur. But it also implies a temporal relationship (someone correct me if I'm wrong), meaning that in order for X to occur, A must occur first.
Is anyone studying in Seoul around Gangnam interested in making a study group? I'm planning on taking the March/April LSAT for the second time if anyone wants to kill this exam together, lots of study cafes here to take PT's/BR at
Anyone know if the scratch paper needs to be blank or can it be ruled/lined?
Planning on taking the lsat on April 25 if anyone wants to meet up and take PT's/BR together under exam conditions and just overall kill this exam together. If anyone is interested email me at leehhl1123@gmail.com or leave a comment here (check every day or so)
Me too! Thanks