I got it E right within the time - I think the phrasing is a bit confusing, but the way I see it, E is right because the argument attacks the proposing politician on the basis of their own previous actions. But forgets that yeah just because they received funds themselves in the past, doesn't mean they can do something ethically to prevent this from happening in the future. We can't just target the guy for taking previous monies, if his entire proposal is to change that. To me it seems like the politician is aware of the issue since he's gotten funds before, so he wants to change that and going forward all future politicians will not have the possibility of this ethical issue/conflict of interest. So the author just looks at the past, but doesn't realize the intention is to avoid what that own politician did so that others do not. So that is how I got E.

4/5 right, the one i got wrong was about industrialist and i had the correct answer initially but in blind review i talked myself out of it lololol i need to trust myself more!

is it possible to fix the beginning of each of these videos to show the stimulus/passage and the answer choices altogether, so we can pause the video there to try the questions on our own first and then continue with the video to see the reasoning behind the answers. I wanted to find the answer A on my own, but the video hides the answer choices and presents you with answer first, which is nice. But this doesn't give me a chance to try on my own with this question, so I could come to my own conclusion first and see why its right or wrong. Just a suggestion!