this page is particularly generic and unhelpful. It'd be nice to have some sample questions here

I found this page to be helpful and somewhat objective! https://www.velocitylsat.com/preptest-difficulty

@judahtravis this is the way! What a thoughtful answer.

For "Average questions answered" -- is this an average over the length of an average tenure at 7Sage? I'm assuming most people cancel their accounts once they've gotten the score they need. Or is at an average over X number of days? @David_Busis

@ygcastro im planning on taking the exam in the summer — LSAC hasn’t released the upcoming dates for the exams yet so I imagine 7sage would have them as options around the time the date and registration are live!

Yes! Right now I'm screesnhoting my results and pasting it into slides and exporting as a pdf ...

@kevin_lin I saw your earlier comment from a few days ago! On my end, I'm using Claude to help spot patterns in questions I'm missing, questions I'm taking too long on, etc. So the option to export data as a pdf instead of my current weird workaround, would be wonderful for sure

Desperately need help here.

I picked D as my original answer.

I said the argument assumes that Smith’s theory is incorrect (lacks insight). I created a nested conditional:

IF Smith’s theory [knowing true meaning of author’s words → needs insight into socials] is Correct → We should be able to discern true meaning from Smith’s Words based off Smith’s Social Circumstances.

The Speakers conclusion is that Smith is not aware of the true meaning of her own words.

This negates the Necessary of my nested conditional above - so I took the contrapositive and arrived at:

Unable to discern true meaning from Smith’s Words based off Smith’s Social Circumstances → Smith’s Theory is not correct.

aka Smith's Theory lacks insight.

I didn't view this as undermining the theory, because the Speaker (stim author) presented the theory with "if she is right", we don't know if she is right?

The lightbulb explanation for B doesn't really make sense/dare I say it's circular?

Most factories in this industry change ownership every two years.

The turnover rate of factory owners is irrelevant. We want to know why workers in “this” industry refuse to strike even though it has been shown that striking while working conditions are poor generally improves working conditions greatly after five years.

The answer choice is focused on "this industry" and the lightbulb explanation doesn't really explain why the owners changing every 2 years is irrelevant — instead it just says that the turnover is irrelevant. Why is it irrelevant? Because we want to know why workers in "this" industry refuse to strike? Maybe I'm misreading this or overthinking?

I’m not in product, but I am in e-commerce and I’m surprised that the mobile design is getting so crowded? I feel like maybe 7sage is an anomaly in that most people are using this website on desktop to more accurately mirror testing conditions? But if this were an e-ecom page, I’d say we need to design it with a mobile-first approach and we need some space to breathe lol the mobile design is getting very cluttered to me. Also — the people yearn for a true Dark Mode experience! Is that still on the roadmap?

@J.Y.Ping yaaasssss this is what i’m talking about, thank you both @MichaelWright

(first off, very very sorry for your loss and sending vibes of comfort and peace to you and your family)

clarifying question — were you planning on submitting for 2026? If you instead were to submit your application for 2027, that'd be much better timing. You could still take the test on the 9th, but you'd also have the option to take another test in June, August, etc! And you'd be better positioned for the 2027 season if you submit your apps as soon as they open in September/November 2026. I don't have answers for your other questions, but I'm sharing this perspective b/c that's how I would adjust given the tough circumstances you're going through!

huh — actually I watched the loom video and realized maybe I'm thinking of a different feature? I'm really enjoying this specific style of tag that ID's the different answer choices as I review my incorrect picks. I'd love to see more of this throughout the platform! It's very helpful for WAJs

It's really helpful to be able to ID these themes present in wrong answers. I picked AC "a" for 142.1.23 and now I see that the trap that got me was "Illusory Inconsistency" haha — very helpful as I work through wrong answer journaling.

I feel like I'm losing my mind. This is a level 3 question, but it kicked my butt?! I feel silly for picking A. I eliminated E because I thought the only quality mentioned was "discernment of social and political" societal arrangements ... but of course the other quality here is "greatness". Just didn't register.

lowkey disappointed I got this wrong again. I picked C on my first take, C again on my blind review. Almost picked A this time around, but almost doesn't count.

if Pronghorns did not herd → they would not face significantly greater danger

Weirdly said. But true. Pronghorns don’t actually need to herd (answer choice A!) they don’t have danger b/c they’re the fastest regardless. If the pronghorns did not herd, they wouldn’t face more danger, because they’re still the fastest alive. Whether they herd or not, they don’t have significant danger because there are no predators alive that can catch them.

\\ if they Would face significantly greater danger → Pronghorns would herd

Taking the contrapositive here messed me up. Reading the original conditional stated in the answer choice E was actually more straightforwardly relevant to the passage! But the contrapositive still makes sense in a convoluted way. It there’s a situation where the pronghorns would face danger, say the extinct predator came back to life or a new predator evolved to be fast enough to catch the pronghorn, then the pronghorns would continue to herd for protection. Pronghorns are going to herd no matter what.

@MichaelWright coming out of an lsat study slump so this is the first time i've been back on 7sage for a week and i'm just seeing your response now! These are good workarounds; thank you for sharing and I sure will tag you if all else fails haha.

@IvonneRosario Yup this is the workaround I've been using — bookmarking classes to watch and then removing the bookmark once I've watched them. It just gets messy though as new classes are added, I watch some classes but need to come back to the class at a later time, do I unbookmark it, do I just keep a separate log, etc.. If I had to pick though, I'm still team prioritizing a proper dark mode haha.

@RUTHZANDERS i won't register until im PTing within my range, but I'm hoping to take it in the late summer or Fall this year!

We are learning a new language! The language of Lawgic! I'm pivoting from a career in digital marketing — we've got this!

LSAT is more important! It's the law school admissions test, and it's written to be an indicator of your potential success in 1L. If your undergrad GPA is low, that's tough for sure, but that's what addendums are for!

Doing the drills is one thing — are you deeply Reviewing the questions you're missing? Deep review = understanding Why you got it wrong, why the wrong answers are truly wrong, and why the right answer is correct + why you missed the right answer, and what will you do differently the next time. This takes a while, but it's helping me!

@Kevin_Lin thank you for that! I appreciate the insight—the parentheses do change the meaning