@MatthewGhebredingle Correct. In my head cannon, its superfluous.

I think it’s important to emphasize here if we want to emphasize suspending common belief for the test. I think we all need to understand that no matter the argument we need to run with it. Say for example we do the negating statement of “elephants feed more in the winter than in the summer.” Okay, whatever let’s assume those premises and claims are true…

@MRod Likewise, put simply the other choices were too convoluted to make any sense.

@AlexB33 I agree, most of the answers can be debated for longer than it would take to simply identify the theme and message of the phrase.

@Ryo Where's my pg13 disclaimer.

Seems like the more fanciful and mind-bending assumptions could just be chalked up to being weak. However, the nuance associated with "what is reasonable" has yet been explained or expanded on. My issue is where does the buck stop when applying what is "reasonable" i.e. what your "average" person coming off the street would say. All notwithstanding most people off the street can't identify countries in the Middle East.