My 7sage interface does not have a highlight option for drilling. Am I subscribed to the wrong plan or something

Currently recognized? So, C is saying no work we are aware of by his students contains orpiment? C wants us to accept that we have discovered all the works by his students that they ever created and there are no more to be discovered. But guess what though, we may have just found a potential new work by his students and it's called Nightbird! Currently recognized actually makes C not correct for me

I mean, if 18 people responded from group A and 800 people responded from group B, that would be a pretty big flaw in the study's accuracy, no? I get that B doesn't say 'substantially more likely to respond', but such a gap is not ruled out either

Yet another completely useless J.Y. explanation video

I guessed correct, but it took me a long time to understand why it's right. It clicked when I focused in on the first word of the stimulus 'many'. We learn that exposing one to a suitable part of a virus is how 'many vaccines' work at least as well as exposure to the whole virus. This is how 'many vaccines' work. But answer choice A tells us, there is reason to believe hepatitis E is one of the few vaccines that doesn't work this way, because a majority of people who are exposed to the whole virus of hepatitis E catch it a second time

Made a note to self that it was an except question. Still forgot and got it wrong

Don't assume. But also, assume which set of codes must be less strict based on zero evidence from the stimulus.

Wish we could get more of an explanation for answer choice D than “Oh, this is great. This is precisely the situation we contemplated. This is good’. In no way is this explanation video helpful

Why do I get this correct but I get the 1/5 difficulty question wrong? This test makes no sense to me sometimes

Not sure what makes A correct. Nowhere in the passage does it indicate the clinical community all investigate the same set of problems, or even that they work from a shared body of knowledge. Wouldn't a trauma researcher be focused on a different set of problems and drawing from a different body of knowledge than a blood cancer researcher? I thought all that bonded them was being a community of clinical experts researching treatments relevant to their own field. I see no indication they investigate a common set of problems from any shared body of knowledge beyond basic science

Only got this right through process of elimination, even though I understand now looking back

All those years as a shy adolescent devoting myself totally to a hobby to help distract me from the loneliness brought on by my shyness finally paid off 😊

Got this question wrong twice now, months apart

Correct through POE. Even after watching the explanation video D makes very little sense

Poop question