So, we are starting with preptest 71 this Saturday?
As our President (Elect) says it best... "WRONG"
Where's JY? Bring him back to explain, we must.
I vote for as late in the afternoon as possible.
For this question, despite getting the answer correct, I mistakingly took a cue from the "however", instead of the "therefore". Is the latter sentence the conclusion because it is more definitive, particularly with the phrase "must temporarily"?
I arrived at the correct answer by thinking that if there were fossils from 3 million years ago, then the ice couldn't have been 'continuously present' for over 14 million years. I am worried that my identifying of points/conclusions is off.
Any advice or insight? Thank you in advance.
My dear friends, have we decided on 5/2 as the official start date? I thank you all for the inspiration and support.
I recommend UCLA campus (the best university in the universe). You will always find a classroom empty and open on the weekend, year round.
This is a good question, but it has left me perplexed.
Doesn't the statement "almost every Wednesday" in the first sentence of the question stem exclude the possibility of every? I understand how it is understood as "most," but I was under the impression that the "almost" was an exclusionary descriptor for Wednesday, preventing the possibility of "all" (or in core curriculum terms, 100...and rather be a range of 51-99). What does almost mean in LSAT world?
I will be present.
Dear All,
I am getting confused on what the contrapositive is for conditional rules in LG that have a subset feature.
For example, if you a grouping game, and there are 3 groups (A, B, C) and the rule states, if P is not in A, then H is not in A. What is the contrapositive of that?
I vote for the alternative strategy.
Lol... I know. Instead, I'm trying to emulate both Luke's relentless training on Dagobah (equivalent to studying for the LSAT), and Yoda's wisdom (a 180).
This professor's response exemplifies why I want to go to law school.
Could someone decipher the nuance of #26? I don't understand how the words "generally" and "wholly" change the meaning from answer choice A.
Thank you in advance!!
I'm interested! Count me in please.
My problem with answer B is that how are we, as the reader, meant to know what France did or did not know at the time?
I am in for all of them as well. Thank you for your leadership and mentorship!
Sorry I missed this one. Revisiting core lessons before PT'ing...Hope to join next week.
Thank you for your leadership, @
Brava!!!
@
Great explanation. One question:
Could you expound on what you mean in the latter part of: " You can know that “unless" means to "negate sufficient" all day long, but if you don’t know what that means, it doesn’t help you.