I'm getting tripped up on the word "Many" in Answer Choice (E). I thought that "many" essentially means "some" on the LSAT. If only some people who regularly consume camellia also consume other beverages suspected of causing kidney damage, is this answer choice really that powerful enough to weaken the argument? Like, if 20 out of 100 people also consume other beverages that can cause kidney damage, what is the impact on the stimulus's argument? #help

i got this wrong because i read this as "however, realistically, those photographs..." and not "however realistically those photographs..."

interested! on PST time though

Q20 -- I chose D but changed to E in blind review. I need to review my conditional logic but if I diagrammed E it would diagram out to:

host thrives -> parasite thrives

That's what the passage says, no? Can anyone explain why this logic I shared is flawed?

this explanation doesn't make sense? JY says it's OK to be over-inclusive and that's why we select E.

then while going through the rest of the answers he says they're all wrong because they're over-inclusive. what?? #feedback